This Is Repugnant .......

[Ann]

and we don't need to know how the "shooter" glorifies in this death, making a tiny boy witness such scenes - makes me think he was as bad as Bin Laden himself. What do you think? If he had to be killed, surely there must have been other ways? Can't decide what I think..........
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2276972/Navy-SEAL-describes-moment-shot-Osama-bin-Laden-3-times-head.html#axzz2KcEzXnpz

[ummmm]

As bad as Bin Laden, who was the most wanted man in the world?

[jackthehat]

I think that there was no other way that it could have been carried out.

I certainly don't think the 'shooter' is glorying in Bin Laden's death, at all.

[Mojo-Jo-Jo]

He wasn't wanted for the 9/11 attacks though.

[Ann]

It wasn't the fact that he was killed that got to me - it was the fact that his little son saw it being carried out ........ poor innocent little boy will remember it forever.

[Mojo-Jo-Jo]

It was dark Ann. With any luck he won't have seen much.

[ummmm]

What did you expect them/him to do? Not shoot because others were in the house?

[ChillDoubt]

There was no other way to kill him. High velocity rounds cause catastrophic and fatal injuries, that's what they're designed for.

Having already been engaged with small arms fire on entering the building the scene was already set. He was going to die in a firefight, simple as.

[shoota]

Bin Laden chose his path in life and chose to take his family along with him. It is unfortunate that the members of his family were present when he was caught but nothing in the article says that the boy was 'forced' to watch, where did you get that from?
The only thing I find repugnant is that the shooter is unsupported and feels the need to gain support through a magazine article.