I'm unable to equate the statement that we have an ageing population with the large influx of young 'foreigners' and soaring birth rates of recent years. This of us who are aged didn't arrive here yesterday so how come the government actuaries and 'experts' didn't anticipate us?
It's been known logically for decades, but was far enough in the future not to worry about. In addition the postulated future was based on the assumption that economic growth would continue at 1960s rates, so caring for an aged population would be no problem, especially as lifespans were based on old patterns. That's why the pension age was 65 / 60 - it was guessed for five years of rapid decline, then death, so no massive cost to the welfare state.
What exactly can we do about it? The retirement age has been raised. People are expected to put more into pensions and pay for their own care if they can. What else should be done?
You say that sandy- a GP visiting one of our clients, said to me, "three quarters of our patients are pensioners. All we have to do us stop giving out aspirin and warfarin. That would wipe most of them out in 2 weeks. Problem solved!"
I wasn't impressed.
Not a nice thing to say at all, but not particularly accurate either.
It wouldn't wipe out most of them, just leave a certain percentage more incapicated, and it would take considerably longer than two weeks