Crosswords0 min ago
Latest Electoralcalculus Poll, For Sqad, Ttt, Et Al
http:// elector alcalcu lus.co. uk/home page.ht ml
Main changes from end of June are :
Con....now 257 seats, up from 249
Lab....now 345 seats, down from 349
Lib.....now 17 seats, down from 19
UkIP...still no seats at all.
Last month EC were predicting the possibility of a 63% chance of a Labour majority, now its 61%.
So little change.
Main changes from end of June are :
Con....now 257 seats, up from 249
Lab....now 345 seats, down from 349
Lib.....now 17 seats, down from 19
UkIP...still no seats at all.
Last month EC were predicting the possibility of a 63% chance of a Labour majority, now its 61%.
So little change.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.OK Naomi...pax !
I post the EC at the start of every month. The site makes for interesting reading, especially the list of vulnerable seats ::
http:// elector alcalcu lus.co. uk/gain loss.ht ml
Note that UKIP are not predicted to take any vulnerable seats at all, despite all the flash and thunder at the time of the Euro Elections a few weeks ago. Also, most of the gains would seem to come to Labour, and the few Tory gains from the Libs.
In other words, dave is not winning the battle of wills with Labour. That is why dave should be concerned that he is unable to break the logjam, and hasn't been able to do so since soon after the 2010 Election. As a Labour voter, I would be happier if they were ahead by a larger margin, but if there were an Election this Thursday, then it would appear that Ed's missus would be in Number Ten, measuring up for new curtains on Friday morning.
I post the EC at the start of every month. The site makes for interesting reading, especially the list of vulnerable seats ::
http://
Note that UKIP are not predicted to take any vulnerable seats at all, despite all the flash and thunder at the time of the Euro Elections a few weeks ago. Also, most of the gains would seem to come to Labour, and the few Tory gains from the Libs.
In other words, dave is not winning the battle of wills with Labour. That is why dave should be concerned that he is unable to break the logjam, and hasn't been able to do so since soon after the 2010 Election. As a Labour voter, I would be happier if they were ahead by a larger margin, but if there were an Election this Thursday, then it would appear that Ed's missus would be in Number Ten, measuring up for new curtains on Friday morning.
Interesting article here Mikey
http:// www.ind ependen t.co.uk /news/u k/polit ics/exc lusive- ed-mili band-wa rned-of -ukip-t hreat-t o-labou r-96453 47.html
http://
// UkIP...still no seats at all. //
UKIP will win a couple of seats at most. But their presence in marginals is going to stir up things unlike any previous recent elections. It is not about them winning seats, it is about who they will take votes from. In marginals, the party that UKIP takes fewer votes from will win.
Elections get closer in the couple of weeks before polling day. Labour should be further ahead now if they are to win a working majority. By Polling day it will be neck and neck.
I expect a hung parliament.
UKIP will win a couple of seats at most. But their presence in marginals is going to stir up things unlike any previous recent elections. It is not about them winning seats, it is about who they will take votes from. In marginals, the party that UKIP takes fewer votes from will win.
Elections get closer in the couple of weeks before polling day. Labour should be further ahead now if they are to win a working majority. By Polling day it will be neck and neck.
I expect a hung parliament.
any idea how they work this out? I just can't see how 3points=100 seats yesterday and apparently 88 today! This EC lot sound a bit dodgy to me, especially given their general tardiness as pointed out by mikey. Labour may well beat the Tories next time but I don't think Ed has caprtured the imagination of the voting public so I don't see them getting 100 more seats and I don't see a clear majority.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.