ChatterBank1 min ago
Bbc Salaries
Seeing as we have no choice but to pay the tv licence, do you think it's fair that highly paid BBC stars and management should have to declare how much they earn?
http:// www.the guardia n.com/p olitics /2016/m ay/11/s alaries -of-top -bbc-st ars-cou ld-be-m ade-pub lic-und er-gove rnment- plans
Or is this commercially sensitive data which should remain private?
http://
Or is this commercially sensitive data which should remain private?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by sp1814. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."Since you question BBC employees because their pay comes from the public purse, what about all civil servants, local government employees etc."
Yes; above a certain agreed level yes. Same argument. Have folk never been amazed when something gets into the press about what your council has paid someone ? Umpteen times what you get for doing you responsible job well. Some salaries/fees are so large one is almost obliged to think must be nepotism between friends in the favoured group, but that can't be right, can it ? Perish the thought.
As for threats of walking, if someone thinks they are worth more than they actually are, then let them walk. That'd bring salaries down eventually, and the companies they walk from will still thrive but with lower costs.
As for what is too much. Folk will have different opinions, and differentials are not unreasonable so long as they are not excessive, and are justifiable. Surely any debate will be able to come up with a compromise on the maximum between thee highest paid by the company and the lowest ?
Yes; above a certain agreed level yes. Same argument. Have folk never been amazed when something gets into the press about what your council has paid someone ? Umpteen times what you get for doing you responsible job well. Some salaries/fees are so large one is almost obliged to think must be nepotism between friends in the favoured group, but that can't be right, can it ? Perish the thought.
As for threats of walking, if someone thinks they are worth more than they actually are, then let them walk. That'd bring salaries down eventually, and the companies they walk from will still thrive but with lower costs.
As for what is too much. Folk will have different opinions, and differentials are not unreasonable so long as they are not excessive, and are justifiable. Surely any debate will be able to come up with a compromise on the maximum between thee highest paid by the company and the lowest ?
Same problem is a different form. You don't directly pay to run the company, it's not funded by a tax, you buy the product as required. So it's difficult to justify: and if gets more difficult the more extreme the situation asked about next. One needs to keep a sense of proportion.
Anyway I'm more concerned about the larger slice of the cake, the tax the government mugs the drivers for, because it can, and how it wastes it.
Anyway I'm more concerned about the larger slice of the cake, the tax the government mugs the drivers for, because it can, and how it wastes it.
Saying no one HAS to pay the licence is an absolute nonsense. It is a tax simple as that.
Should salaries be published, yes they should.
Are they commercially sensitive, no. I would bet my bottom dollar that all the 'head hunters' know the salary pretty much anyway. And those they dont know they would not be interested in.
Ideally the BBC, along with its tax, should be abolished anyway.
Should salaries be published, yes they should.
Are they commercially sensitive, no. I would bet my bottom dollar that all the 'head hunters' know the salary pretty much anyway. And those they dont know they would not be interested in.
Ideally the BBC, along with its tax, should be abolished anyway.