It may be that Pence considered it, but he can't unilaterally, for obvious reasons. Not enough of the Cabinet is on board regardless of what Pence was thinking.
So, Impeachment it is. I don't think it will pass the Senate with 2/3 majority, but it wouldn't surprise me to see at least a few Republican Senators voting to convict (more than last time, when it was only Romney).
// Removing Trump by constitutional means is a tall order for the 12 days remaining in his presidency, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) has not made a formal determination to move forward with a second impeachment, even as she consulted Friday with the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff about curbing Trump’s ability to launch nuclear weapons. //
The point, JD, would be to ensure that he is barred from ever holding office again -- and to send a message that, you know, a President inciting a riot against the legislature is not OK.
I reckon many who might have voted to convict, or at least considered it, will reach the same "what's the point, he's gone in seven days?" conclusion. They are wrong, because Trump was going anyway. There need to be extra consequences for what he did or tried to do.
I understand that although it may be little more that a token gesture, the thinking is that it will be a show of strength and unity, not to mention a way of showing that a president cannot get away with these actions.
Impeachment merely disbars him from current and future office. It does not convict him of any crimes. As the chances of Trump ever regaining any office in the future are 0% I still don't see the point. Once he is out of office then due legal process can begin.
Unfortunately, the chances are not 0%. 74 million people voted for him, and I reckon easily around 70 million of them would do so again. Maybe that won't be enough because in practice the mere prospect of Trump running again would be enough to terrify more people into voting against him; but as we saw in 2016 and 2020, the fear of the "radical left" is often strong enough to give a wholly unsuitable candidate a chance they don't deserve.
If Trump is impeached and loses the Presidency, his successor (Pence presumably) can pardon him.
Better to see out the next 11 days and then prosecute Trump, and barring him from office.
This puts me in mind of the old Acts of Attainder, a useful device whereby monarchs could dispose of their enemies without recourse to judicial procedure. There has only ever been one successful impeachment in Britain and that was in the 18th century.
By the way, only three days earlier that same former acting Solicitor General was being interviewed about Trump's phone call to the Georgia governor, trying to find 11780 votes. Remember that phone call? It took place less than a week ago, a long time in politics. Here's the interview ...