Tory Donor Lord Bamford Funds The Reform...
News2 mins ago
News From Deutschland.
Saxony and Thuringia: Germany resumed flying convicted criminals of Afghan nationality to their home country despite human-rights concerns, days before regional elections in which migration is a big campaign issue. The AfD is predicted to come in first in at least one of the elections, which would give a far-right party the most seats in a state parliament since World War Two. Chancellor Olaf Scholz promised more deportations after a deadly mass stabbing in Solingen. A Syrian man with Islamic State links is the suspect.
Seems be the right thing to do wouldn't you say?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Khandro. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Stable doors and horses spring to mind.
You would know better than me but as I understand it immigration is causing massive difficulties in Germany. So it's unsurprising that parties pledging to do something about it are gaining support.
What I don't understand (and it applies in the UK as well) is why such parties are described as "Far Right". If there is a massive problem being caused for the people already in the country by people arriving from abroad (many of them uninvited) then surely it is the duty of the government to do something about it. Come election time, any paries choosing to ignore such a problem deserve to lose support.
So why has it suddenly become "Far Right" to pledge to act in the best interests of people already in the country?
Yes, the governement here seems to have got away with using the 'far right' excuse, and the same seems to being done elswhere, but I think the tactic wil wear thin and more and more people will see through it, and frustration will build as people see their legitimate concerns are being ignored by the politcal class who don't face the issue as much as the average citizen does, especially in deprived areas.
'Newspeak' - ..... correct agenda.
No that is not newspeak. Newspeak involved the wholesale scrapping of words. 'Good' was OK but why have 'bad'? rather than ungood?
the idea was that the reader cdnt even say " Big Brother is double-plus ungood" as it made no sense. BB cd NOT be ungood.
see addendum in '1984' (the book)
"Far right" is not twisting words and portrays accurately, shaven tattooed drunk pot-bellied voter. - certainly not Newspeak - but perhaps True-speak !
(yeah OK I am heading for an early shower)
governments don't get it, letting in huge numbers of young men with dubious back grounds, all i forsee is when they have leave to remain, they will bring there families over, it's like a beach head ruse, makes me wonder how long till someone in power coughs and says this is unsustainable, and had the spine to end this invasion and start mass deportations, not just the uk but the eu as well, but i won't hold my breath, diversity is our strength, reminds of dorothy in the wizard of oz, theirs no place like home...
Further news from Deutschland.
https:/
https:/
Seems be the wrong thing to do wouldn't you say?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.