So It Was Just Another Dirty Con Trick...
News2 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by bluedog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.According to the web site (and a book I have) it was given to the NT in 1987.
http://www.nationaltrust.org.uk/main/w-vh/w-visits/w-findaplace/w-kedlestonhall/
Often the NT will only take a house if the person giving it also provides money for its upkeep (the NT cannot take every house they are asked to take).
Many houses were taken in the 80s and 90s with support from the National Heritage Memorial Fund and Historic Buildings Council (not sure if they still exist) including Kedleston Hall
Another NT book I have (From Acorn to Oak Tree) a history of the NT, says Curzon inherited Kedleston and spent much of his rich American wife's money restoring it.
He hoped it could stay in the family and when he died he said in his will he wanted it left in good hands.
It says his nephew Lord Scarsdale presented it to the trust in 1987.
The NT were first offered it in 1983 but could not afford to take it, so eventually the government came up with 13.5 million and Lord Scarsdale gave 1 million.
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.