Hi Darth!! I believe that Bush did this because his campaign for the presidency received financial sponsorship from corporations and industries which stand to gain increased profits from not having to bother with proper disposal of hazardous waste, or by disposing it outside of the USA. If someone sponsors you (your campaign, etc.), you feel indebted to them, and you might feel like you have to look out for *their* interests in the future, as your payback to them. This is NOT to say that I agree with any of these actions, or even with the logic... it is simply the tragic truth of the matter. Traditionally, Republican candidates for any political office receive financial backing from corporations, whereas Democratic candidates receive financial backing from environmental groups. A candidate who doesn't have financial sponsorship of some kind, from somewhere, will never make it to office. A campaign costs the candidate a lot of money, and he/she really can't finance it all by him-/herself. Of course this situation is NOT good for America herself, as pollutants from any one country will spread all over the world, and eventually right back to our own USA. It is only "good" for the corporations and industries who end up saving a little money. Anyway, this is why I vote Democrat, although lots of people are understandably disenchanted with the entire system.... sigh.