A Simple question for Ed

[jimmy rimmer]

Ed, can i ask if you can possibly provide some evidence relating to your following comment on the first blog entry in Sports Answerbank? "In response to all of your comments and suggestions the following changes have been made to the SAB" 1.The homepage has now been uncategorised and so users now have a browsable overview of all questions in SAB. 2.All of the sub categories have been removed from the main menu and so there are now only the main categories remaining. 3.There is a link in place which will take you back to the AnswerBank once you have finished on SAB We have tried to incorporate as many of your comments and suggestions as possible, I hope this is reflected in the changes we have made. Enjoy the new SAB, SAB Editor The evidence i am after is, who on earth suggested changing it to its current method?? Also, if you were to have conducted a poll before the changes, i guarentee that the majority would of wanted to keep it how it was. Please answer Ed. I only want your reasoning behind changing SAB in the first place, then maybe we could have a sensible discussion about it. Many Thanks Jim

[Craig007]

Good luck Jim, I don't fancy your chances of a reply though.

I like the comedy in the SAB Editor's Blog, for example it starts with "Hello again SABers", thats SABers PLURAL, as in more than 1!! You don't get comedy like that very often!

4 questions in the SAB today, keep up the good work SAB!

[bobtheturkey]

i can only think that ab is being paid to use the design that the sports bank has which is why they are so stubborn about removing it when clearly it is a complete shambles, why else would it be an entirely different set of graphics and style from the other sections its an outside job

[mrrobbo15]

its not this eds' fault......it was planned b4 they arrived and nothing can b done...

ive been through it time n time again with the ed......ive just given up........shame but there you go