you may not agree with them but that is not a reason to ban them. The 2 you mention may publish extreme views in a robust style but they are usually not directly abusive. In the cyber world of free speech we have to accept others may have extreme and contrary views. Just ignore them, you encourage them by playing the "outraged of Tunbridge Wells" card, dont give them the "oxygen"!
There is an alternative. If instead of using pseudo names they were made to use a real name. How many would object to this, I wonder. What has anybody got to hide? I believe the real reason is because however sincerely put there will always be someone who will take offence.
1 to 10 of 10
Do you know the answer?
What is the point in banning people from this site....