Is This The Final Nail In The Coffin For...
News2 mins ago
No best answer has yet been selected by Kay. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.I can see why you feel like this FINA, but no I don't think it would be right to bring it back. I do not feel that it is justified to enlist unwilling people to be ready to fight in wars that should never happen, ie. Iraq.
Also I do believe in individual freedom to choose.
What I do feel would be better is to bring Parenting back, along with the values which have gradually disappeared over the last four decades.
Thank you thank you thank you!! I thought I was the only one who thought National Service was a good thing.
National Service does not just mean going to places like Iraq .... it gives a sense of pride in serving your Country at HOME as well as overseas. It also teaches good trades that benefit you in Civvy Street, helps develop social skills (oh yes, you learn a LOT of diplomacy in HM Forces) and if nothing else think of the team building skills you would acquire.
I have 3 children and if they re-introduced Nat Service I will happily wave them off to serve their time.
No convincing me. Living near a forces base until it closed recently, I have seen just as much bad behaviour from the base personnel as from all the other yobs.
I think our whole society is corrupt and I don't think bringing back National Service in this day and age will make an iota of difference. I certainly wouldn't like to see a child of mine join the forces.
I haven't yet witnessed any yobbish behaviour in any of the friends and acquaintances that my son mixes with. Why should they be expected to do national service?
If people wish to serve their country in this way, then it should be through choice. There are plenty of other ways to be of use to people.
< P>I
I would agree with the idea, (sorry FP!). Even my youngest of 17 has said it would be a good idea for young offenders!!
If this was brought back it may help restore self disipline, respect and regard for others and their property, respect for authority, and maybe the caring, community spirit of days gone by, plus get the sh*tes to do something useful for a change!!
Come on Tony think about it!!
Thanks for your views, FP I have 3 sons. One got involved with yobs and became one himself doing untold damage plus drugs and I wished to God that constcription was in.He also knew a teen girl who broke into her grans home( 79 years old),tied her up,gagged her and punched her then took her purse Why? to buy eggs for halloween.This little lady had 2 months community service.I would vote to bring back conscription anyday.
I personally agree with National Service for the same reasons as MrsCheeks & lindy loo.
However, I also agree with FP. Our Courts are far too lenient with the yobs of today. A much firmer approach in the the first instance of crime, would possibly act as a good deterrent! So come on Mr. Blair do something about it now, before it is too late!
I've always been in favour of National Service, though as an ex serviceman I'm biased on that. Excellent point by Fakeplastic as well though, parental responsibility is now a joke to many in this country.
I'm for NS because before I joined the Army I will admit to being the biggest, most idle waste of space imaginable. I would just be getting out of bed as my father came home from work at 2 p.m. then I'd mope around the house whilst he mowed the lawns etc. He told me to my face when I joined up that I wouldn't make it because of the traits I was so used to showing.
This did spur me on when I felt like leaving after 2 weeks and I stuck it out. The Army gave me confidence, discipline, pride in one's appearance, taught me the value of true friends, respect for others, team spirit, fortitude, comradeship and the ability to be self reliant when the need arose.
Without blowing my own trumpet you don't often see these qualities displayed by the Playstation Generation that seem to gather outside the local shop of an evening, thinking it's 'kewl' to verbally abuse anyone who passes by.
For chrissakes all of you!
what is conscription for?
You get someone and put them in the army for a year or two and then throw them out. What is that meant to do ? The army is not there as an employment agency, it is there to er - kill people
pacify Iraq (which everyone agrees needs a lot of pacification)
and blindly carry out Blair's orders
The function of the army is NOT to educate or re-edcuate wayward young men
I am sorry that FINA has had trouble with her offspring. Wishing them on the army is not the answer
Actually reading Peter Pedant's answer, If I understand him correctly, he is saying much the same as me, albeit using stronger tones.
The forces are their for a purpose. People who join the forces should be aware of that purpose and willing to act accordingly. It should not be used as a reform system.