Food & Drink1 min ago
Should it be for Hague too stand down or Cameron?
14 Answers
http://tinyurl.com/66wg43h
It would seem that William Hague is being made the scrape-goat for the decision to take SAS troops into Libya.
/// Mr Hague said the decision to send special forces into the country had been taken after ‘professional and military advice’.///
Surely the last word in all this should rest upon the PM's shoulders, because I would have thought that his permission would have had to be gained first.
It would seem that William Hague is being made the scrape-goat for the decision to take SAS troops into Libya.
/// Mr Hague said the decision to send special forces into the country had been taken after ‘professional and military advice’.///
Surely the last word in all this should rest upon the PM's shoulders, because I would have thought that his permission would have had to be gained first.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Hague has admitted his responsibility for the event, I loved the comment from the opposition that if Hague goes to visit his mates, does he climb over the fence in the middle of the night. Sounds like a real hash to me, the people the envoys were supposed to meet didn't know it was them. I don't know how much is delegated to Govt dept., DC can't surely know it all at any one minute?
Fortunately Military and Diplomatic cоck ups like this are few and far between (or so we are told).
Don't forget, the Conservatives were out of office for 13 years, so they are on a learning curve, and we should expect them to be useless at first.
No one was hurt, unlike our other recent adventures and no Prime Ministers resigned over that.
Don't forget, the Conservatives were out of office for 13 years, so they are on a learning curve, and we should expect them to be useless at first.
No one was hurt, unlike our other recent adventures and no Prime Ministers resigned over that.
I personally don't believe William Hague or any other member of our Government have anything to stand down for.
The mission to escort a British diplomat, was not a covert one and therefore, the tactics used, would not have been of a covert nature. It is due to this reason that the SBS, not the SAS (as correctly pointed out in a previous statement), were 'comprimised'. The notion that the SBS were captured and treated with hostility by the rebel forces, has been forced down our throats by almost every major branch of media the World has to offer. In fact, the SBS were mereley repremanded by the rebels and civily asked a few questions. Would'nt you stop 9 foreign men who were walking through your neighbourhood and ask them what they were doing?
In conclusion, it is clear that this event, as with all political issues, has been greatly exagerated and blown out of proportion in order to sell news and attempt to sway people's political stance.
The mission to escort a British diplomat, was not a covert one and therefore, the tactics used, would not have been of a covert nature. It is due to this reason that the SBS, not the SAS (as correctly pointed out in a previous statement), were 'comprimised'. The notion that the SBS were captured and treated with hostility by the rebel forces, has been forced down our throats by almost every major branch of media the World has to offer. In fact, the SBS were mereley repremanded by the rebels and civily asked a few questions. Would'nt you stop 9 foreign men who were walking through your neighbourhood and ask them what they were doing?
In conclusion, it is clear that this event, as with all political issues, has been greatly exagerated and blown out of proportion in order to sell news and attempt to sway people's political stance.
Neither should resign.
I do think they would get the PM's nod. As the leader of the goverment he is ultimately responsible for any actions the goverment takes. If everytime we sack a goverment leader or head of department for every military blunder/mistake, we would be sacking people left, right and chelsea. (beauty of hind sight)
I do think they would get the PM's nod. As the leader of the goverment he is ultimately responsible for any actions the goverment takes. If everytime we sack a goverment leader or head of department for every military blunder/mistake, we would be sacking people left, right and chelsea. (beauty of hind sight)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.