Yes Mibn -
but you then get the situation in the USA where 1% of the population now possess 25% of the wealth. They don't create jobs - they just hoard what they have and buy Mercedes and swimming pools (the 'American Dream') while 50 million people don't even have healthcare. The protests in New York are a result of that inequality of wealth. The same inequality of wealth underlie the Arab Spring and the problems in Europe.
We are now seeing the same in the UK with a smaller and smaller number of people possessing more and more of the wealth. Those people do not generate jobs or redistribute wealth. I was in business and an employer for many years and tax cuts and increased personal wealth would not have encouraged me to employ more people (there's no need to diverge here into what would).
History shows that extremism rises in popularity as the middle classes and the ordinary people feel more threatened. The public don't care about political theory or rhetoric, they only care about safeguarding their future and those of their children. If a party or ideology can guarantee those futures when others can't or don't, or they won't address fundamental social issues, then history shows that any party offering an answer will be given a chance.