ChatterBank0 min ago
Why is the USA the only major western economy that doesn't have universal health care?
68 Answers
Why do so many quintessential middle Americans find the idea of a United States style NHS so objectionable?
Answers
// Why is the USA the only major western economy that doesn't have universal health care? //
Because healthcare is for goddam commies, f&gs, pinkoes, and pu5sies.
21:14 Tue 07th Feb 2012
Interesting post slaney... a point to ponder though... (there are problems with American health system, no doubt) is one of th emajor costs imposed on the public is neither self-imposed nor governement imposed (in a way) that being the amazingly high costs of malpractice awards here. Example; a patient sued a doctor and hospital for leaving the proverbial "sponge" in following a minor, elective operation. The mistake was found by the doctor and rectified within hours but the patient (guided by a lawyer who received 75% of the final award) continued with the suit anyway. The patient was awarded $2.2 million dollars for the "mental anguish" he supposedly suffered.
I ahve a son-in-law who is a General Surgeon... he spends $127,000 yearly for malpractice insurance and he's never been the subjected to any lawsuit for any purpose.
If our beloved government would simply pass one more law... designed to prevent such abuse, our health care costs could be reduced by 25% yearly, by most estimates. Those who have suffered true malpractice should be compensated of course, but usually a suit will be brought forward to the insurance company for the hospital and/or doctor for say a paltry sum of perhaps $80,000. The insurance company will negotiate that sum down to maybe $50,000 and pay it with no further fight simply because to do so would cost more than that sum. Goes on all the time.
Reason the U.S. government (both political parties) are reluctant to pass such badly needed laws is the tremendous sums invested by the attornies as political donations each year. They don't want to damage that cash cow... (rant over)...
I ahve a son-in-law who is a General Surgeon... he spends $127,000 yearly for malpractice insurance and he's never been the subjected to any lawsuit for any purpose.
If our beloved government would simply pass one more law... designed to prevent such abuse, our health care costs could be reduced by 25% yearly, by most estimates. Those who have suffered true malpractice should be compensated of course, but usually a suit will be brought forward to the insurance company for the hospital and/or doctor for say a paltry sum of perhaps $80,000. The insurance company will negotiate that sum down to maybe $50,000 and pay it with no further fight simply because to do so would cost more than that sum. Goes on all the time.
Reason the U.S. government (both political parties) are reluctant to pass such badly needed laws is the tremendous sums invested by the attornies as political donations each year. They don't want to damage that cash cow... (rant over)...
Well... rant almost over... one last thing... due to the tremendous risk posed by frivolous malpractice suits and answering slaney's suggestion the U.S. patient may not be getting good value is the fact that doctors and hospitals will perform many largely uneeded tests just to protect themselves from accusation that they didn't do enoughfor th epatient... andding mulitple millions of unecessary dollars to the costs...
Clanad, the practice of doing extra tests just to cover yourself from malpractice is widespread in the NHS as well - no one wants to be sued, so I suspect that's not the reason for extra costs. You may well have higher administrative charges.
I don't wish to knock American healthcare, which has some first rate services and a history of excellent innovation with rigorous evaluation, but from this side of the pond it seems somewhat inequitable.
Sqad - we've had this discussion before..
http://www.theanswerb...2.html#answer-5790863
... the results especially for breast cancer are now on a par with those in France.
On a cold day like today, however I could be persuaded to go to live in sunnier climes!
I don't wish to knock American healthcare, which has some first rate services and a history of excellent innovation with rigorous evaluation, but from this side of the pond it seems somewhat inequitable.
Sqad - we've had this discussion before..
http://www.theanswerb...2.html#answer-5790863
... the results especially for breast cancer are now on a par with those in France.
On a cold day like today, however I could be persuaded to go to live in sunnier climes!
slaney....LOL...we have indeed.
Don't know about France, but UK is still well down in the European cancer survival rates...........although improving!
The US beats all the world countries in cancer survival rates.
Over investigating has always been aimed at our friends over the Atlantic, but might i add that this is responsible for the superb cancer survival rates.
Under investigating could be levelled at the UK, but in my opinion this is forced upon them by lack of hospital facilities and could this state of affairs be reflected in the poor cancer survival rates?
Don't know about France, but UK is still well down in the European cancer survival rates...........although improving!
The US beats all the world countries in cancer survival rates.
Over investigating has always been aimed at our friends over the Atlantic, but might i add that this is responsible for the superb cancer survival rates.
Under investigating could be levelled at the UK, but in my opinion this is forced upon them by lack of hospital facilities and could this state of affairs be reflected in the poor cancer survival rates?
There is more money spent per patient in the USA than in all other nations with a national healthcare system. The reason? As patients or insurers are willing to pay, US doctors prescribe unnecessary treatments and medication simply to keep the pennies rolling in - to their own pockets!
How can the USA spend trillions of dollars operating huge aircraft carriers, a global fleet of submarines, B2 bombers, a space programme etc - and completely ignore the medical or social welfare of their own people? It's seems that people will only recieve treatment if they pay. If they can't afford healthcare or don't have a job - tough! That's their own fault! The US then talks about Freedom with a capital 'F'! Freedom to live on the streets it seems and the freedom of 50 million people to have no access to healthcare!
Let's pray we never sink to that heartless level here.
How can the USA spend trillions of dollars operating huge aircraft carriers, a global fleet of submarines, B2 bombers, a space programme etc - and completely ignore the medical or social welfare of their own people? It's seems that people will only recieve treatment if they pay. If they can't afford healthcare or don't have a job - tough! That's their own fault! The US then talks about Freedom with a capital 'F'! Freedom to live on the streets it seems and the freedom of 50 million people to have no access to healthcare!
Let's pray we never sink to that heartless level here.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.