ChatterBank0 min ago
Is It Ok To Have An Abortion On The Grounds Of Gender?
51 Answers
http:// www.tel egraph. co.uk/n ews/ukn ews/law -and-or der/102 90200/A bortion -laws-l eft-mea ningles s-as-do ctors-p ut-abov e-the-l aw.html
Following the decision not to prosecute two doctors who agreed to arrange abortions of baby girls purely because of their gender, even though there was enough evidence to charge those doctors, it seems fair to say that Britain's abortion legislation has become, up to 24 weeks at least, "meaningless".
Is it acceptable that a woman can de facto have an abortion on any grounds, including gender?
Following the decision not to prosecute two doctors who agreed to arrange abortions of baby girls purely because of their gender, even though there was enough evidence to charge those doctors, it seems fair to say that Britain's abortion legislation has become, up to 24 weeks at least, "meaningless".
Is it acceptable that a woman can de facto have an abortion on any grounds, including gender?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Ellipsis. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ./////Keyplus, this could develop into a huge argument, if a tumour is growing nside of you and you want rid, then surely that is murdering the tumour?////
So a human being is equal to a tumour as long as he has not arrived into this world yet. Even if he has eyes, nose, eras, a beating heart and so on. Very good logic.
So a human being is equal to a tumour as long as he has not arrived into this world yet. Even if he has eyes, nose, eras, a beating heart and so on. Very good logic.
Change it to:
is it lawful ....
and the answer is no definitely not - this (gender abortion) falls outside the Abortion act 1967 and therefore falls inside the Offences against the Person Act 1861
I really really expected Sqad to know this....
This (the decision not to prosecute ) is not a precedent and the decision not to prosecute does not have an effect on the operation of law in the future.
The GMC [ the doctors' regulator ] may or may not have a memorandum of understanding with various bodies including the CPS - we know they have with various bodies - but they have no lawful/legal standing
and this accounts for the news that people are planning a private prosecution.
I dont think gender abortion is a matter solely for the GMC
I am surprised the CPS does.... did.
what was the question ?
is it lawful ....
and the answer is no definitely not - this (gender abortion) falls outside the Abortion act 1967 and therefore falls inside the Offences against the Person Act 1861
I really really expected Sqad to know this....
This (the decision not to prosecute ) is not a precedent and the decision not to prosecute does not have an effect on the operation of law in the future.
The GMC [ the doctors' regulator ] may or may not have a memorandum of understanding with various bodies including the CPS - we know they have with various bodies - but they have no lawful/legal standing
and this accounts for the news that people are planning a private prosecution.
I dont think gender abortion is a matter solely for the GMC
I am surprised the CPS does.... did.
what was the question ?
The question is as in the OP: Is It OK To Have An Abortion On The Grounds Of Gender?
I guess more specifically it is, "Accepting that abortion up to 24 weeks is acceptable in some circumstances, is it acceptable in all circumstances?"
And using gender selection as a practical example of a circumstance which might really test the thinking ...
I guess more specifically it is, "Accepting that abortion up to 24 weeks is acceptable in some circumstances, is it acceptable in all circumstances?"
And using gender selection as a practical example of a circumstance which might really test the thinking ...
it doesn't say that exactly, because by law there is no abortion given solely on gender selection, it may be that it happens, which means the woman lies about her mental/physical health, and the doctors don't know, or they are complicit, or that she has it done privately, same rules should apply, there never should be gender selection abortion. this matter came up in another post, see if i can find the other link
http:// www.abo rtionri ghts.or g.uk/in dex.php /media- and-res ource-c entre/a bortion -law/27 6
http://
if the woman said she was distressed by the sex of the baby my understanding of the law is that she would not get the abortion, she may if she says she is physically/mentally unsound, so lies. We shouldn't be playing these sorts of games, China has come unstuck over this matter as some know, and now they are reaping the rewards.
this was the info i gleaned last time
http:// www.bab ycentre .co.uk/ a101430 3/the-s cience- behind- sex-sel ection
http://
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.