Gaming5 mins ago
Thatcher Ignored Poll Tax Warnings
Archives opened under the 30 year rule suggest that TGL ignored warnings that the poll tax was unworkable.
// However, the opened archives also reveal a memo penned by the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, Nigel Lawson, who said the measure would be "unworkable" and "politically catastrophic".
"The biggest gainers will be the better-off households in high rateable value properties, the losers would be poorer households, particularly larger ones," he wrote. //
She ignored that good advice and led to her ousting. Ah well...
// However, the opened archives also reveal a memo penned by the then Chancellor of the Exchequer, Nigel Lawson, who said the measure would be "unworkable" and "politically catastrophic".
"The biggest gainers will be the better-off households in high rateable value properties, the losers would be poorer households, particularly larger ones," he wrote. //
She ignored that good advice and led to her ousting. Ah well...
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.But the general concensus subsequently was that it was fair, so not really sure what the story is about.
The BBC hardly even mention it, they're more pre-occupied with the changes in education she mooted:
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -306259 41
The BBC hardly even mention it, they're more pre-occupied with the changes in education she mooted:
http://
The Community Charge (aka Poll Tax) was a much fairer system of taxation than Council Tax, in that it was paid by each person, rather than by each household and urgently needs to be re-introduced.
However I fully accept that the way it worked wasn't fully thought through (or, indeed, hardly thought through at all) in respect of the way that it affected those on low incomes. When it's re-introduced (as must surely come) a great deal more thought needs to be put into it.
However I fully accept that the way it worked wasn't fully thought through (or, indeed, hardly thought through at all) in respect of the way that it affected those on low incomes. When it's re-introduced (as must surely come) a great deal more thought needs to be put into it.
My perception of Mrs Thatcher is that she always understood opposition, but she never understood dissent.
Someone completely disagreeing with her was seen as a valid position, but anyone partly disagreeing with her - especially anyone in her cabinet - was perceived as disloyal.
Mrs Thatcher came to see dissent as disrespect, and it ultimately cost her the job she so loved.
Someone completely disagreeing with her was seen as a valid position, but anyone partly disagreeing with her - especially anyone in her cabinet - was perceived as disloyal.
Mrs Thatcher came to see dissent as disrespect, and it ultimately cost her the job she so loved.
Indeed Ludwig - and I think history shows that she became ever more intransigent with the passing of time, to a final point where it was impossible to reason with her about anything - and again as history shows, she paid the price for that approach.
It is a lesson which thus far no party leader has repeated.
It is a lesson which thus far no party leader has repeated.
//It is a lesson which thus far no party leader has repeated. //
Hmmm, Brown had a pretty good go, and Blair, or at least his spin doctors representing him were not far behind too. Cameron/Clegg have had no choice, it being a coalition.
It's a problem that befalls most leaders that are in place too long.
Hmmm, Brown had a pretty good go, and Blair, or at least his spin doctors representing him were not far behind too. Cameron/Clegg have had no choice, it being a coalition.
It's a problem that befalls most leaders that are in place too long.
Yes she did because it was a good system, better than the current mess. The problem as that hoards of the great unwashed discovered that, horror of horrors, they were going to have to contribute to local funding, oh dear! yes gromit it did contribute to her downfall mainly because of the disgusting gutless popinjays she had in her midst. I would prefer Community charge today and I think a lot of asset rich pensioners would too.
Nige Baby missed out the other gainers who would have been older people living in the family home once the family have flown the nest. Councils can make an allowance for this but they still pay over the odds. I agree that payment per adult person is a much fairer way of funding services.
Wasn't the campaign against it carefully organised rather than the "grass roots reaction" it pretended to be?
Wasn't the campaign against it carefully organised rather than the "grass roots reaction" it pretended to be?
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.