News7 mins ago
Trump Sparks More Controversy ?
23 Answers
urging all people who want to hold up the 2nd ammendment to shun hillary and vote for him.
biased bbc news saying that trump is sparking contaversy , how ?
seems pretty valid to me, if i wanted to hold onto my guns of course i would not be voting in hitlery.
biased bbc news saying that trump is sparking contaversy , how ?
seems pretty valid to me, if i wanted to hold onto my guns of course i would not be voting in hitlery.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by dieseldick. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
From the article links published here, it sure doesn't seem to be rubbish. It seems a fairly blatant yet deniable hint at shooting the person giving them grief. At the most charitable it could be seen as a thoughless unfortunate choice of words. Pretty much standard for Trump as he picks and chooses meaning after seeing what the public reaction is.
The clip shown on Sky News this morning had the camera facing directly at Trump, so behind him were ranks of his supporters, nearly all of whom were laughing at his comment about gun-fans possibly taking action against Clinton. They knew what he meant all right and it wasn't that they should make sure not to vote for her! If that were likely, why would they even have been there?
Listening to the precise remarks it's clear that Trump never said in so many words that Clinton should be assassinated. But suggesting to people at a rally in his support that maybe they shouldn't vote for Clinton over this one issue is clearly not what he was meaning either. It's the sort of statement that's made deliberately ambiguous so that anyone can interpret it legitimately as a call for assassination while still being defensible.
To coin a phrase, it's pretty shabby of Trump to say this. In some sense, I'd expected better of him -- after his remarkable victories in the Republican nomination I had thought he would have the adaptability to widen his appeal. So far, he's narrowing it daily.
To coin a phrase, it's pretty shabby of Trump to say this. In some sense, I'd expected better of him -- after his remarkable victories in the Republican nomination I had thought he would have the adaptability to widen his appeal. So far, he's narrowing it daily.
Actually for the sake of clarity he says "that would be a horrible day if Hillary gets to pick her judges" (although where the sentence break actually is isn't always that clear whenever Trump speaks).
But the rest of the speech is straight out of the NRA's "I can't construct a coherent gun rights argument really so I'll just talk about the bad guys a lot until I get applause", so I wouldn't want to give him too much credit.
But the rest of the speech is straight out of the NRA's "I can't construct a coherent gun rights argument really so I'll just talk about the bad guys a lot until I get applause", so I wouldn't want to give him too much credit.
O i got it as...
.
"Hillary wants to abolish
essentially abolish the second amendment
by the way
if she gets to pick her judges
nothing you can do folks
"the second amendment ,people may be, there is I dont know
but I'll tell you what, that would be a harrible day ...."
on the viddie there is the guy in red who goes like 'whaaaa?'
and his wife sitting next to him just laughs ....
.
"Hillary wants to abolish
essentially abolish the second amendment
by the way
if she gets to pick her judges
nothing you can do folks
"the second amendment ,people may be, there is I dont know
but I'll tell you what, that would be a harrible day ...."
on the viddie there is the guy in red who goes like 'whaaaa?'
and his wife sitting next to him just laughs ....
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.