Film, Media & TV0 min ago
Why Vote Tory?
80 Answers
Not looking for a fight or any name calling, I just really would like to know...
I have never understood why working class/lower middle class people vote Tory when the Labour party better represent their interests. I know that the Labour Party is not perfect and I understand many of the reasons that people choose not to vote for them... but why vote Tory?
So I would love to hear from Tory voters what it is about the Tory party that earns them their vote.
Thanks
Andrew
I have never understood why working class/lower middle class people vote Tory when the Labour party better represent their interests. I know that the Labour Party is not perfect and I understand many of the reasons that people choose not to vote for them... but why vote Tory?
So I would love to hear from Tory voters what it is about the Tory party that earns them their vote.
Thanks
Andrew
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by andrew1707. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ."Since the beginning of time a quality education's generally also been the preserve of the wealthy..."
Not when I was at school it wasn't, Jim, as I explained earlier. And my school probably provided just about the highest quality education that could be obtained without paying (and in many respects better than some fee-paying schools of the time provided).
The grammar school conundrum is always attacked with the "not everybody can have it, so nobody can" argument. It then somewhat illogically descends into attacking grammar schools for being so good by comparing them to other schools which are so bad.
No, not everybody can have a grammar school education. Agreed, some of the alternatives are a bit dire. But because they are is no reason whatsoever to scrap grammar schools.
Not when I was at school it wasn't, Jim, as I explained earlier. And my school probably provided just about the highest quality education that could be obtained without paying (and in many respects better than some fee-paying schools of the time provided).
The grammar school conundrum is always attacked with the "not everybody can have it, so nobody can" argument. It then somewhat illogically descends into attacking grammar schools for being so good by comparing them to other schools which are so bad.
No, not everybody can have a grammar school education. Agreed, some of the alternatives are a bit dire. But because they are is no reason whatsoever to scrap grammar schools.
In any case, it is their moral duty https:/ /mobile .twitte r.com/T ory__Je sus
-- answer removed --
Grammar schools only took the brightest kids so they could have a curriculum better suited to the brightest kids. As mentioned before, that shouldn't be misinterpreted as ignoring those who weren't so bright as they also had a curriculum which suited them.
I was listening to Liz Lochhead on Desert Island Discs last night and she mentioned how she benefited from a golden age of education. That is what makes me sad, we shouldn't be leaving it in a worse state than we found it.
I was listening to Liz Lochhead on Desert Island Discs last night and she mentioned how she benefited from a golden age of education. That is what makes me sad, we shouldn't be leaving it in a worse state than we found it.