Can Intellect Outweigh Attractive Looks?

[Nameless14]

What do you think?

[douglas9401]

I imagine you're a stunner.

[ummmm]

It's more than intellect. You need a good personality.

[dannyk13]

Are you implying that you can't have both?

[Cloverjo]

Depends on the person you're hoping to impress. For me, amazing good looks could not compete with a decent brain.

[ummmm]

And to me good looks wouldn't beat a sense of humour.

[Sqad]

An ugly, intellectual, badly dressed woman, with a good personality would not appeal to me.

A good looker with no personality and poor dress sense could be trained.

[jim360]

I often ask my partners this question. They say they can't decide between my intellect and my good looks.

[dannyk13]

Proobably can't decide because they can't see them Jim :-)

[Barmaid]

Looks fade; dumb is forever.

[jim360]

I deserved that, danny :P

[Spungle]

If you're on Eggheads, yes, if you're on X Factor, no.

[Baldric]

///Can Intellect Outweigh Attractive Looks?///

Luckily for me, my Partner of 34 years has a fair share of both.
(Happy Bunny ;o)

[atalanta]

Not at first glance. If you go for first impressions rather than gradually getting to know someone, you'll go for good looks, and may eventually be disappointed. But I have to take issue with Sqad, who suggests someone ( a woman ?) could be "trained" to be a good dresser and to have a better personality. Is she some sort of pet like a dog, then, to be trained to be what its "owner" desires ?

[Sqad]

Atalanta......it is a bilateral process, she molds me into what she wants and i mold (train) her into what i want...........
pet dog doesn't come i to it.

[Old_Geezer]

Not into threesomes then.

[Sqad]

O_G....LOL....that is a different technique all together...;-)