ChatterBank4 mins ago
Diversity Corner
21 Answers
I was going to use "Pseuds' Corner" as the title, then I realised that the following quote by a Peter Gordon doesn't even make it past Grade 1 Stupid.
Background to story. Novelist Lionel (it's a "her") Shriver has just been sacked as the judge of a short story competition because of an article ( I read it actually) ) in last week's Spectator in which she criticised Penguin's recently announced diversity policy. (Full article here: https:/
Part of Shriver's article:
“We can safely infer . . . that if an agent submits a manuscript written by a gay transgender Caribbean who dropped out of school at seven and powers around town on a mobility scooter, it will be published, whether or not said manuscript is an incoherent, tedious, meandering and insensible pile of mixed-paper recycling.”
The person who sacked Shriver, editor Debbie Taylor, came out with some middle grade pseud, saying:
“Mslexia’s raison d’être has been to provide a safe space for all women writers to develop their craft. We actively encourage entries from marginalised writers and frequently draw attention to the issues they face. Although we welcome open debate, Shriver’s comments are not consistent with Mslexia’s ethos, and alienate the very women we are trying to support”
Anyway, back to Mr Gordon, editor of the Asian Review of Books in Hong Kong, who "hits back" with:
“It is easy to deride diversity as a warm and fuzzy social objective without objective substance, but without diversity the English literary world would not have Homer, Dostoevsky or García Márquez.".
Background to story. Novelist Lionel (it's a "her") Shriver has just been sacked as the judge of a short story competition because of an article ( I read it actually) ) in last week's Spectator in which she criticised Penguin's recently announced diversity policy. (Full article here: https:/
Part of Shriver's article:
“We can safely infer . . . that if an agent submits a manuscript written by a gay transgender Caribbean who dropped out of school at seven and powers around town on a mobility scooter, it will be published, whether or not said manuscript is an incoherent, tedious, meandering and insensible pile of mixed-paper recycling.”
The person who sacked Shriver, editor Debbie Taylor, came out with some middle grade pseud, saying:
“Mslexia’s raison d’être has been to provide a safe space for all women writers to develop their craft. We actively encourage entries from marginalised writers and frequently draw attention to the issues they face. Although we welcome open debate, Shriver’s comments are not consistent with Mslexia’s ethos, and alienate the very women we are trying to support”
Anyway, back to Mr Gordon, editor of the Asian Review of Books in Hong Kong, who "hits back" with:
“It is easy to deride diversity as a warm and fuzzy social objective without objective substance, but without diversity the English literary world would not have Homer, Dostoevsky or García Márquez.".
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by vetuste_ennemi. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Yes, the absurdities of real life can outrun the poweres of the most inventive parodist. As the late "Peter Simple" (Michael Wharton of the Daily Telegraph) observed.
Anyone remember Dr. Spacely-Trellis, the go-ahead bishop of Bevindon ("We are all guilty, we are all to blame")?
And J. Bonington Jagworth, leader of the militant Motorists' Liberation Front and defender of "the basic right of every motorist to drive as fast as he pleases, how he pleases and over what or whom he pleases".
https:/
Anyone remember Dr. Spacely-Trellis, the go-ahead bishop of Bevindon ("We are all guilty, we are all to blame")?
And J. Bonington Jagworth, leader of the militant Motorists' Liberation Front and defender of "the basic right of every motorist to drive as fast as he pleases, how he pleases and over what or whom he pleases".
https:/
[Pedantry warning]
For a literary editor, Mr Gordon is a little uninformed.
Homer didn't write -- his poetry was passed down from generation to generation by word of mouth and wasn't written down until years later.
Furthermore the "English" literary world only has English transaltor's versions, which are not all identical.
For a literary editor, Mr Gordon is a little uninformed.
Homer didn't write -- his poetry was passed down from generation to generation by word of mouth and wasn't written down until years later.
Furthermore the "English" literary world only has English transaltor's versions, which are not all identical.
This is the full article Shriver wrote for the Spectator:
https:/
https:/
So in my latest masterpiece, a story about customers storming the shops on Black Friday, can I still say, "black," or how about, "Friday of an unusual hue?"
And how do I say, "Man the barricades?" How about, "Will somebody get behind the barricades?"
Oh this is so exhausting. I'll never finish my novel at this rate.
And how do I say, "Man the barricades?" How about, "Will somebody get behind the barricades?"
Oh this is so exhausting. I'll never finish my novel at this rate.
