ChatterBank7 mins ago
Austerity Intensifies.
91 Answers
News item. Now we have baby banks. Food, nappies cots and toys.
Disgraceful.
I wish we could have retrospective prosecutions for the bankers and the other elites responsible for the 2008 crash, including the so called regulators who failed us all.
These Tories are shameless.
Disgraceful.
I wish we could have retrospective prosecutions for the bankers and the other elites responsible for the 2008 crash, including the so called regulators who failed us all.
These Tories are shameless.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Leaps of logic? 2008, crash, then deficit, then austerity, then cuts cuts cuts. And the weakest take the brunt.
Homeless up. Kids in school hungry and ill clothed.
High rents, cuts to all council funding, so cuts then to essential local services.
And the crash has nothing to do with it?
Well every newspaper, politician, news channel and council, police nhs etc must all have it wrong. Be sure to tell them eh?
Homeless up. Kids in school hungry and ill clothed.
High rents, cuts to all council funding, so cuts then to essential local services.
And the crash has nothing to do with it?
Well every newspaper, politician, news channel and council, police nhs etc must all have it wrong. Be sure to tell them eh?
“The 2008 crash is relevant as it plunged the country into a debt we are still paying, and the burden falls mainly on the weakest in our society.”
No it doesn’t. The burden of repayment falls mainly upon those paying taxes. Those not paying any are not contributing to the repayments.
“People lose jobs, manage only part time or zero hours jobs.”
So they do. And other people never have jobs or any intention of securing one.
“Relationships break up, unplanned pregnancies, and sudden health issues all contribute.”
And some pregnancies occur with no relationship whatsoever in place, leading to instant – and very often deliberate – single parenthood.
If people today are struggling because the “government” (i.e. the taxpayer) will not provide them with enough money to support the number of children they feel the need to knock out then they need to re-assess their circumstances and reduce their expectations.
No it doesn’t. The burden of repayment falls mainly upon those paying taxes. Those not paying any are not contributing to the repayments.
“People lose jobs, manage only part time or zero hours jobs.”
So they do. And other people never have jobs or any intention of securing one.
“Relationships break up, unplanned pregnancies, and sudden health issues all contribute.”
And some pregnancies occur with no relationship whatsoever in place, leading to instant – and very often deliberate – single parenthood.
If people today are struggling because the “government” (i.e. the taxpayer) will not provide them with enough money to support the number of children they feel the need to knock out then they need to re-assess their circumstances and reduce their expectations.
Some weeks ago the government were announcing the end of austerity.
I'll believe that, when the unemployed aren't been sanctioned to hunger for turning up 5 minutes late to an appointment. Or when people who lose their low paid jobs are required to wait 5 weeks for £72 pound to exist and have to ask for a handout of baked beans...
Yes, we all know people who work the system but the majority do not.
I'll believe that, when the unemployed aren't been sanctioned to hunger for turning up 5 minutes late to an appointment. Or when people who lose their low paid jobs are required to wait 5 weeks for £72 pound to exist and have to ask for a handout of baked beans...
Yes, we all know people who work the system but the majority do not.
//I'll believe that, when the unemployed aren't been sanctioned to hunger for turning up 5 minutes late to an appointment. //
Why shouldn’t they be penalised for failing to turn up on time? They’ve got all the time in the world to get there and if they cared enough they would make damned sure they are there. As Karl says it’s always someone else’s fault.
Why shouldn’t they be penalised for failing to turn up on time? They’ve got all the time in the world to get there and if they cared enough they would make damned sure they are there. As Karl says it’s always someone else’s fault.
Theland, many can help their circumstances - but won't. Why shouldn’t they be penalised for failing to turn up to appointments on time – and why blame 2008 for any hardship people now, who are having children they can’t afford, are experiencing? If they can’t afford to have kids they shouldn’t have them – and if they do have them they should take responsibility for them. The rest of us do – and just think what would happen if we didn’t.
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”
Only fools and horses …..
“From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs.”
Only fools and horses …..
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.