Tommy Robinson Against Child Grooming

[TheDevil]

If Tommy Robinson was so concerned about child grooming, then why isn't he and his boys protesting against Prince Andrew and his connection to child groomer Jeffrey Epstein?

[TheDevil]

The main point of my thread is that Prince Andrew, Duke of York was accused of grooming. Tommy Robinson made it his ambition to expose groomers. With the recent interview and how he has been criticised for it (Prince Andrew and grooming, that is.) I am surprised that Tommy Robinson hasn't come out of the wood work to comment on the ordeal.

[Spicerack]

Doubt you'll get much support for this, Devil. Even from the Tommy haters.

[TheDevil]

Pixie374 - "I know you dislike "terminology", but it is helpful if we can all understand each other."

I am not sure what you mean. I have never discussed terminology with anyone.

The difference between a groomer and a paedophile is quite clear. I do not need to discuss that with you.

[pixie374]

Ok, if you don't know, that's fair enough.

[TheDevil]

Spicerack - "Doubt you'll get much support for this"

I am not looking for support. I would just like to debate the hypocrisy that can be seen in Tommy Robinson for giving such publicity to certain accused groomers, and not other accused groomers.

[pixie374]

Over 43,000 cases, according to wiki. Tommy Robinson would be very busy!

[TheDevil]

Pixie374 - "Tommy Robinson would be very busy!"

Not many cases are so high profile as this one.

[jackthehat]

As has already been stated, it is not hypocrisy.
The 'Groomer' is a dead American.......

It would be a bit difficult for TR to get involved with that.
(Isn't he banned from entering the US of A?)

[pixie374]

High profile? That seems more that you think some cases are more important than others, than Tommy does.
I don't even like him, but even I can see this is not his job to work out.

[Spicerack]

Tommy's having a break. He can hardly turn the spotlight on every groomer in the country. (not that PA is a groomer)
You thought this would make you popular with the Tommy-Haters. Unfortunately, for you,the biggest one quit the site recently.

[Barmaid]

Prince Andrew has NOT been accused of grooming.

The allegation is that a young woman was forced by JE on 3 occasions to have sex with PA. PA denies this. JE who allegedly procured young women for the rich and famous is dead.

[TheDevil]

Pixie374 - "That seems more that you think some cases are more important than others, than Tommy does."

High profile means to be in a position attracting much attention or publicity.

I can tell you for a fact that is the case with this situation. Being high profile isn't about importance, but publicity. Do all child grooming cases get as much publicity as the Epstein relationship with Prince Andrew?

[TheDevil]

Barmaid - "Prince Andrew has NOT been accused of grooming."

Yes he has, by victims.

[pixie374]

I know what it means, thedevil. This is something we are all aware of. Maybe Robinson is working on the lower-profile cases, instead. Equally important.

[TheDevil]

Spicerack - "You thought this would make you popular with the Tommy-Haters."

I do not hate Tommy. I admire his ambitions and the courage he has to face all the snide and hatred he gets from those who sympathise for these groomers.

I find his silence on this topic odd.

[TheDevil]

Pixie174 - "I know what it means, thedevil."

Then how does my use of the word high profile (when refering to Prince Andrew and his relationship with Epstein) give the impression that I think some cases are more important than others?

Do you just say things for a reaction sometimes?

[pixie374]

Was one of my answers removed there? I don't think it broke any rules?

[jackthehat]

What?!?

PA hasn't been accused of grooming, he's been 'accused' of having sex with a couple of women who did so 'reluctantly' but because they had been pressured by Epstein.

[pixie374]

No, spath. Just genuine questions. You seem worried that he is not fighting for this particular case, when there a literally thousands of others. Why are you most bothered about this one?
And "sympathise with these groomers" is quite a revolting accusation.

[TheDevil]

It seems that this is not the discussion forum for me. My first experience here seemed rather mellow.

This one... Not so much.

I am not "spath". I do not want to be involved with a question and answer website where my answers are tainted with prejudice.