//no that encourages more participation, that's when it becomes destructive//
I did read it, ttt. I just don't agree. It becomes destructive when people become addicted. And while I fully agree those people should get much more help than they do, I don't agree the answer is to ban everything that might cause a problem, like some kind of nanny state.
Realistically, if you have a point- we would ban all gambling, smoking, alcohol, sex, drugs, exercise.... and everything else that a minority get addicted to.
I think you need to support the people that do struggle, but not necessarily remove it from everyone else, who can keep it under control.
We have alcoholics, so should we ban alcohol?