ChatterBank7 mins ago
George Galloway Dislikes Israelis
Answers
David Tully wanted to work for the benefit of Rochadale, Galloway wanted to work for the benefit of hamas.
And unsurprisingly he got elected.
https:/
he's a narcissist simple as that, does he really care about either side, i doubt it, just gives lip service, from his past speeches to now...odious troll of a man, bit like mosley and the guy who inspired him, im just waiting for him to incite islamists to go further... probably won't because he's a weed...
Since the proposition for the debate was - 'Israel should withdraw immediately from the West Bank' - how did Mr Galloway imagine the debate was not going to involve someone putting forward the israeli position?
And since he advises that he 'does not 'recognise Israel, that makes his ability to speak on the subject of their actions nul and void.
So how can he claim he was 'misled' because the gentleman addressing the debate first is an Israeli?
Yes, that gave him an excuse to flouce out, no doubt retaining his fee - but as I pointed out, the premise of the situation should have rendered him umable to attend in the first place.
I'm sure Mr Gallowy has not got where he is today by actually being a moronic idiot, but clearly, as on this occasion, that in no way prevents him from behaving like one.
If I as an atheist, was invited to a debate about 'The moral authority of God', I would declare myself uable to attend and argue reasonably, since my absence of belief in God makes the proposition meaningless to me.
Mr Galloway has managed a double whammy - he has avoided the tiresome task of justfying his unwavering support for a terrorist organisation, and he has gained publicity for himself personally, surely a major reason why he is in poilitics in the first place.
And I bet they laid on dinner for him first!
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.