Donate SIGN UP

war!

Avatar Image
meredith101 | 18:14 Wed 24th Oct 2007 | Society & Culture
8 Answers
What is it good for?

Do you think world leaders would be so quick to get into battle if they themselves and their own kids had to face the enemy face to face?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v0GRR_n_yQGA
war
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 8 of 8rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by meredith101. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
How would you suggest we abolish war then ?

Disarm I suppose.

Churchill served with distinction before WWII, as did Hitler.
Question Author
Those with a lead in morals and civilization like the West should think more carefully before rushing into wars like Gulf War I and II and using them to take over other sovereign states for selfish interests.
Rudyard Kipling is often thought of as a bit of an imperialist warmonger - "thin red line of heroes" and all that.

His son John was killed in world war I after he'd called in favours to get him a comission.

After he wrote : If any question why we died/ Tell them, because our fathers lied.

It rather affected him

As long as there are humans on the planet there will be warfare, so, abolish the human race and there you have it, world peace.
Look at history and kings and leaders, and their sons, have been at the forefront of battle.

That didnt' stop war.
If they dropped all their weapons and went fistycuffs who d'you think would win?
My moneys on Chairman Mao - i bet he's got a few good moves
Sally, Chairman Mao has a few good moves? I hope not - he's dead!
In the natural world, nature regulates animal populations, with us, its war, our way of regulating the ever increasing world population.

It'll keep on happening until we destroy ourselves.

1 to 8 of 8rss feed

Do you know the answer?

war!

Answer Question >>