Quizzes & Puzzles0 min ago
Lazy Jobless
26 Answers
Should people who choose not to work be entitled to any benefits?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by flip_flop. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.This is always a touchy subject. They certainly shouldn't be entitled but it has a flowon effect.
Many of these professional unemployed are already dabbling in illegal activities and getting no benefit would only force them to increase their shady behaviour and cost heaps more while in prison. This is not a good reason to give them a benefit but what can be done?
Many of these professional unemployed are already dabbling in illegal activities and getting no benefit would only force them to increase their shady behaviour and cost heaps more while in prison. This is not a good reason to give them a benefit but what can be done?
why dont they have them out sweeping streets and removing graffiti then?? if they choose to claim benefits and not work for a living they should be made to contribute something to society to justify the benefits. im the same i got made redundant depsite paying into the system for 10 years and i felt like a criminal when i went to the local jobcentre to enquire if i could claim anything until i gained alternative employment.
david - how would you feel if you were a street cleaner with the council, facing redundancy because the unemployed had to do it on the cheap?
And if you were the council supervisor, how would you feel overseeing people who simply did not want to be there or did not have the nous to follow direction?
And if you were the council supervisor, how would you feel overseeing people who simply did not want to be there or did not have the nous to follow direction?
no ethel, I mean people who are fit and well, have school age children who refuse to volunteer at the very least for a couple of hours a week.
my mom lives next door to a lad in his early 20s who spends his days getting drunk and having parties every evening. It would be more beneficial for him to do something more worth while.
its not black and white ethel, I wouldnt want peoples children to starve, but the people who refuse to work and are fit and healthy should at least help in their communities if they cannot do work
my mom lives next door to a lad in his early 20s who spends his days getting drunk and having parties every evening. It would be more beneficial for him to do something more worth while.
its not black and white ethel, I wouldnt want peoples children to starve, but the people who refuse to work and are fit and healthy should at least help in their communities if they cannot do work
-- answer removed --
i think that people who say they can't get a job and who receive benefits should have to do something to earn those benefits....i know that in some countries if you don't have a job then you are given a job by the local council such as street cleaning or sewers maintenance and paid a very low wage,thus prompting those "employees" to rush out and get a job with an employer.....the obvious exceptions being those with a REAL disability...why couldn't this work in the uk??? give those layabouts thier benefits but only if they do a 40 hour week for the council...problem solved!
Food stamps and vouchers ARE sold on the black market in the US.
Exaclty as milk vouchers used to be sold for cigarettes in the UK.
Make the unemployed work for the council for benefits, and there would be far fewer proper jobs in the council. Why should the council or any other organisation take on staff, unpaid or not, that are not willing to work or not have the mental faculties to do a proper job without close supervision?
They would be responsible for them and end up paying hundreds of thousands in compensation because of accidents/ill health and lord only knows what else.
Exaclty as milk vouchers used to be sold for cigarettes in the UK.
Make the unemployed work for the council for benefits, and there would be far fewer proper jobs in the council. Why should the council or any other organisation take on staff, unpaid or not, that are not willing to work or not have the mental faculties to do a proper job without close supervision?
They would be responsible for them and end up paying hundreds of thousands in compensation because of accidents/ill health and lord only knows what else.