Is this acceptable?

[Ethel]

There is no denying she is a pretty girl, and the nudity is not graphic, but is the context objectionable?

Just who is this photo aimed at?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1 066776/Revealed-Femme-fatale-Lily-Coles-contro versial-nude-cover-French-Playboy.html

[imhotep]

Ooooooer matron!!!

No wonder the bear is smiling!!
Lol......

[ELVIS68]

I agree with Waldo, the bear`s got more meat on it than her and better looking too

[jno]

she has an interesting face, which the cover at least seems to have been ditched. But I don't think the 'little girl look' goes any further than a ribbon in her hair and a giant teddy. She plainly has an adult body. It seems a bit bizarre to me (doubtless some men will think otherwise); but I don't find it objectionable.

[jno]

PS jayne, are you seriously suggesting Playboy's picture editors missed something? I think not.

[JockSporran]

Wow! What a doll! Thanks for showing me that, Ethel.

[China Doll]

I just get the urge to make her a sunday roast and chocolate cake... she looks like she needs feediing! I'm afraid I don't find her sexy or attractive at all and as such the picuture just leaves me feeling that she needs to eat something.

[chakka35]

The Times reported yesterday that 'Christians' are demanding a boycott of M&S because of this picture.

If there is a reasonably sensible Christian reading this could he or she please explain what there is in semi-nudity that is objectionable to their plainly bonkers co-religionists.

[jno]

chakka, I wouldn't be surprised if the nudity inside the magazine is more than semi. It doesn't seem anti-Christian, though, unless there is an 11th commandment along the lines of 'thou shalt not commit nudity'.

[CT]

She's been more nude than that before 'for art'.

[terambulan]

If she cant exploit her looks now for income she certainly wont have much luck in her 60s. Go girl, I say!