Question Author
I don't know. The whole thing is very disturbing. I just would have thought that at 12 weeks, when they are still a long way from being viable, she could have been made to realise that life for the poor little things was going to be extremely difficult, not to mention life for her and her family and, dare I mention it, the enormous cost to the Health Service. Many embryos abort naturally at that stage, and beyond. For some reason, these didn't. Now she has two little girls, joined along the breast bone and no one knows what to do about it yet. Surely, there are now worse decisions to make:
Does she let them stay the way they are and let them suffer for the rest of their lives?
Does she allow them to be operated on and risk at least one of them dying or, at best, be badly deformed?
One of the poor little mites probably will have to die because they share one liver. Perhaps they would even have to decide which of the two should survive?
So many difficult questions and decisions now and so much suffering, both on the part of the little babies and their family. Couldn't all this have been avoided by persuading her to have a very early abortion??