Crosswords4 mins ago
DR10 Dispute
Two years ago i was convicted of a driving offence DR10. I pleaded guilty in court and was given a 16 month licence disqualification (with option of attending rehabilitation course). However, recently i have decided its time to get my licence back and reading over the documentation which was supplied at that time - it seems that the court was under the impression my breath contained 100 microgrammes of alcohol (the test performed at the station) BUT i am positive that the lowest value (of the two tests performed at the station on night of offence) was 52 microgrammes.
The documents that state the incorrect figure are the 'DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS DRINK-DRIVE REHABILITATION SCHEME REFERRAL ORDER SECTION 34A(2) OF THE ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENDERS ACT 1988' under the section 'Details of Offender'. (states Alcohol Level: BREATH 100 MICROGRAMMES)
Also the DVLA letter on confirmation, they 'received details from the court'. The letter doesnt actually state the incorrect figure but rather suggests its over 87.5 microgrammes as indeed the letter states, 'The disqualification outlined below are ones the law recognises as being an indication that such drivers may misuse alcohol in a way that could make them unfit to hold a driving licence' - '...disqualification for driving...when the level of alcohol in your body equalled or exceeded...(i) 87.5 microgrammes per 100 mililitres of breath' - 'Your recent disqualification means that you fall into one of the above categories.'
I am now worried that under the immense pressure and stress i faced at that time i missed a vital flaw in the case against me... as indeed i am not trying to flee from the charge of driving under the influence but the truth of the matter is, that the court sentenced me (it seems) under almost double the severity...
Any advice on my next approach - Do i need to get a solicitor?
The documents that state the incorrect figure are the 'DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS DRINK-DRIVE REHABILITATION SCHEME REFERRAL ORDER SECTION 34A(2) OF THE ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENDERS ACT 1988' under the section 'Details of Offender'. (states Alcohol Level: BREATH 100 MICROGRAMMES)
Also the DVLA letter on confirmation, they 'received details from the court'. The letter doesnt actually state the incorrect figure but rather suggests its over 87.5 microgrammes as indeed the letter states, 'The disqualification outlined below are ones the law recognises as being an indication that such drivers may misuse alcohol in a way that could make them unfit to hold a driving licence' - '...disqualification for driving...when the level of alcohol in your body equalled or exceeded...(i) 87.5 microgrammes per 100 mililitres of breath' - 'Your recent disqualification means that you fall into one of the above categories.'
I am now worried that under the immense pressure and stress i faced at that time i missed a vital flaw in the case against me... as indeed i am not trying to flee from the charge of driving under the influence but the truth of the matter is, that the court sentenced me (it seems) under almost double the severity...
Any advice on my next approach - Do i need to get a solicitor?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by disputeee. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If the 16 month disqualification was before taking off the time for you to attend DDR the guidelines suggest your reading was calculated at between 36 and 59 mg in breath.
100mg in breath carries a disqualification of 23 to 28 months plus community order. These figures are calculated on first offence
100mg in breath carries a disqualification of 23 to 28 months plus community order. These figures are calculated on first offence
My God, the things people think they should be able to appeal against
You did it, you drove whilst under the influence, accept it, you cannot change it
You have a cheek to even think you need a solicitor - for what? You got off lightly, far to lightly
Worry not, anymore, I can tell you you deserved your ban
You did it, you drove whilst under the influence, accept it, you cannot change it
You have a cheek to even think you need a solicitor - for what? You got off lightly, far to lightly
Worry not, anymore, I can tell you you deserved your ban