Donate SIGN UP

on religious broadcasting

Avatar Image
handiman | 13:03 Wed 10th Feb 2010 | Society & Culture
7 Answers
I object to all religious broadcasting. If people want it get your own tv channel.
why should public money be wasted on superstitious clap-trap. programs
examining morality and ethics in a non religious context would be useful.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 7 of 7rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by handiman. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It's objectionable when it's compulsory for the broadcaster to allot time for it. The BBC is so obliged. Atheists, as it happens nowadays, get plenty of time but that is not an obligation,as such, on the BBC (and nor should it be)
fredpuli47 -Name the progs that are for Atheists !
I object to all reality shows. If people want it get your own tv channel.
I object to all soap operas. If people want it get your own tv channel.

I object to all .................. If people want it get your own tv channel. (fill in your own choice)
Brionon I said 'time' not 'programmes' ! Though Prof Dawkins had a good run of programmes in which he demonstrated his....er...disbelief. We have patently atheist comedians on our screens (Jimmy Carr is a notable example) Mind, some in the religious community would have us believe that the BBC is run by atheists !
As well as Dawkins program there was "A short history of disbelief" I think it was called which was excellent and the fabulous "nine lessons for godless people" Probably still on iPlayer.

I think BBC has a right indeed a duty to reflect views across the board and at the moment it's there but not overpoweringly so
I object to Davina McColl
Question Author
who doesn't object to davina.....does it mean divine in greek?

1 to 7 of 7rss feed

Do you know the answer?

on religious broadcasting

Answer Question >>