I think that any sane person would think that it is morally wrong to insist on biblical or chucrch lead teachings above the evidence of preventible death through the use of items such as condoms.
However,as always, the arguments are slightly more complicated than that. When considering these issues, and concluding that those of a fervent religious persuasion are either blind or wilful, t is worth bearing in mind that those believers who advocate that religious beliefs should take precedence over the empirical are also implicit believers in an eternal afterlife of either heavenly paradise or hellish damnation, and that by using a condom, or, in the case of jehovahs witnesses, refusing blood or blood component transfusion, one is putting ones eternal soul at risk - And for believers, thats a far more terrible alternative.
Nonsense, of course, but worth bearing in mind...... :)