Crosswords2 mins ago
Holy books, worth reading?
51 Answers
Could reading a holy book make you believe in a god if rational thought has ruled out the possibility.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jomifl. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.The Absolution movement was based on Jesus' teaching that stated all were equal in the eye of God. Here black men's rights were put ahead of women. It takes time to change people. Slavery existed long before any modern religion. The strong have always ruled the weak and the many are ruled by a few. There were no rules about how to treat a slave before the Old Testament so it was an improvement at the time. One man's influence may take years to come to fruition. In the case of Jesus it took 1800 years or so before man caught up to what he was saying. If my post came across as arrogant I do appologise.
Cowtipper ...'a fair cop'
http://idioms.thefree...y.com/It's+a+fair+cop
http://idioms.thefree...y.com/It's+a+fair+cop
Ah, I see the (new) point, Cowtipper. Your original point was that the Church was responsible for the abolition of slavery. You now seem to concede neither the Bible's teaching nor any of its followers for over 1600 years after Christ were abolitionist? (We are agreed so far, aren't we?). But (this is my inference from your last post; I hope I'm not putting words in yoour mouth) Christian teaching humanized, or at least mitigated the worst excesses of the institution (better only one leg than both) until such a time as it could be abolished completely. Am I understanding you correctly?
y books do
y books do
Cowtipper starts with the assumption that religion is the source of all thngs good. Every perspective is warped by that ridiculous prejudice.
Religion had stood in the way of the advancement of civilisation by insisting that a stupid book written by arrogant men is the last word on morality. Only when their bigotry threatens to completely undermine the last shreds of their credibility do they ever change their position.
Indeed religion did not invent slavery but they certainly indulged in and sustained it.
I notice you have not continued to defend the church's undeniably profoundly chauvanistic attitude to women. Anyone who would claim that the church has even the slightest contribution to the advancement of women's rights is obviously deeply deluded.
Indeed that claim is one of the most idiotic I have seen posted here. Considering the presence of the Elderman and his multiple alter-egos that is quite remarkable.
Religion had stood in the way of the advancement of civilisation by insisting that a stupid book written by arrogant men is the last word on morality. Only when their bigotry threatens to completely undermine the last shreds of their credibility do they ever change their position.
Indeed religion did not invent slavery but they certainly indulged in and sustained it.
I notice you have not continued to defend the church's undeniably profoundly chauvanistic attitude to women. Anyone who would claim that the church has even the slightest contribution to the advancement of women's rights is obviously deeply deluded.
Indeed that claim is one of the most idiotic I have seen posted here. Considering the presence of the Elderman and his multiple alter-egos that is quite remarkable.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.