Spam & Scams0 min ago
The Bible Author ...
25 Answers
would you read his other works?
he seems to have been a pretty imaginative chap...
what kind of other books do you think he'd have written? -
what would his 'books by the same author' page at the start of the bible have said?
(i realise there was probably more than one contributor to it, but one man was probably ultimately responsible for its final content)
he seems to have been a pretty imaginative chap...
what kind of other books do you think he'd have written? -
what would his 'books by the same author' page at the start of the bible have said?
(i realise there was probably more than one contributor to it, but one man was probably ultimately responsible for its final content)
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by joko. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.As demonstrated by the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls[i, it's well known that other than the [i]Penteteuch], the various books of the Old and New Covenants were written individually and over a very extended period of time. (Applicable more to the Old Testament than the New). The compilation into a 'book' is a very recent development, all were originally individual, named, scrolls.
The compilation of the Jewish 'Old Covenant" occrurred over a long period of time as referenced here (for example): "...Some suggest that Ezra and/or Nehemiah were responsible for the first true organization, with Judas Maccabeaus being the one who put an "official" deposit of the sacred writings in the Temple. [Mill.OrB, 128, 135; Leim.CHS, 27-9]
The earliest "hard" indication we have of any sort of classification or categorization of OT books - aside from internal OT references to the books of Moses, and assuming that the reference is not a late interpolation, as some do - comes from the Wisdom of Sirach, a book dated to approximately 130 BC and written by Sirach's grandson [Mill.OrB, 18; Beck.OTNT, 110-1]. The classifcation scheme refers to the law, the prophets, and the "other" ancestral books.
This does not reflect a "fixed" canon of books, merely a basic classification scheme, although it is known that most of what we call the OT today was indeed put into one of these three classes - indicating what Campenhausen calls, at this time, a "normative collection of sacred writings" [VonCamp.FCB, 2] as settled." (Source: Comfort, Philip Wesley, ed. The Origin of the Bible. Wheaton: Tyndale House, 1992. ).
Further, the clearest indication of cannoical development of a "Book" comes from "... Josephus' description of the Jewish holy books in Contra Apion 1.8, dated c. 93-95 AD. After clearly identifying the Pentateuch as the work of Moses [Rost.JOHC, 24; Leim.CHS, 32], Josephus writes:
From the death of Moses until Artaxerxes...the prophets who followed after Moses recorded their deeds in thirteen books. The remaining four comprise hymns to God and rules of ethical conduct for men." (Source: Leiman, Sid Z. The Canonization of Hebrew Scripture: The Talmudic and Midrashic Evidence. New Haven: Transactions, 1976.)
The same generally, holds true for the development of the collection we know as the New Covenant... except there's good evidence they all were written much closer together, time wise, than in the OT.
The compilation of the Jewish 'Old Covenant" occrurred over a long period of time as referenced here (for example): "...Some suggest that Ezra and/or Nehemiah were responsible for the first true organization, with Judas Maccabeaus being the one who put an "official" deposit of the sacred writings in the Temple. [Mill.OrB, 128, 135; Leim.CHS, 27-9]
The earliest "hard" indication we have of any sort of classification or categorization of OT books - aside from internal OT references to the books of Moses, and assuming that the reference is not a late interpolation, as some do - comes from the Wisdom of Sirach, a book dated to approximately 130 BC and written by Sirach's grandson [Mill.OrB, 18; Beck.OTNT, 110-1]. The classifcation scheme refers to the law, the prophets, and the "other" ancestral books.
This does not reflect a "fixed" canon of books, merely a basic classification scheme, although it is known that most of what we call the OT today was indeed put into one of these three classes - indicating what Campenhausen calls, at this time, a "normative collection of sacred writings" [VonCamp.FCB, 2] as settled." (Source: Comfort, Philip Wesley, ed. The Origin of the Bible. Wheaton: Tyndale House, 1992. ).
Further, the clearest indication of cannoical development of a "Book" comes from "... Josephus' description of the Jewish holy books in Contra Apion 1.8, dated c. 93-95 AD. After clearly identifying the Pentateuch as the work of Moses [Rost.JOHC, 24; Leim.CHS, 32], Josephus writes:
From the death of Moses until Artaxerxes...the prophets who followed after Moses recorded their deeds in thirteen books. The remaining four comprise hymns to God and rules of ethical conduct for men." (Source: Leiman, Sid Z. The Canonization of Hebrew Scripture: The Talmudic and Midrashic Evidence. New Haven: Transactions, 1976.)
The same generally, holds true for the development of the collection we know as the New Covenant... except there's good evidence they all were written much closer together, time wise, than in the OT.