ChatterBank1 min ago
Judge Rules Teen Jw Must Have A Blood Transfusion
172 Answers
What do you think to this case?
I am all for authorizing blood transfusions when the prognosis is such that the patient will almost certainly die if they do not receive a transfusion, and where there is a clear expectation that having received a blood transfusion the chances of survival are markedly released, and were this case about a young child, under 15-16 say I would probably not have any issues with the decision.
But a 17 year old only months away from being 18? Not sure we should be forcing patients to receive blood -having to sedate them to give them a transfusion - is warranted.
http:// www.the age.com .au/nat ional/t een-wit ness-mu st-have -a-tran sfusion -rules- judge-2 0130417 -2i0lc. html
I am all for authorizing blood transfusions when the prognosis is such that the patient will almost certainly die if they do not receive a transfusion, and where there is a clear expectation that having received a blood transfusion the chances of survival are markedly released, and were this case about a young child, under 15-16 say I would probably not have any issues with the decision.
But a 17 year old only months away from being 18? Not sure we should be forcing patients to receive blood -having to sedate them to give them a transfusion - is warranted.
http://
Answers
@Lazygun - the judge presumably decided he was not Gillick competent. More on it here.. http:// www. kslr. org. uk/ blogs/ humanrights/ 2012/ 01/ 20/ article- 8- and- minors- right- to- refuse- medical- treatment/
18:34 Thu 18th Apr 2013
I'd argue it's rather more arrogant to insist on "my body my choice" than to pay attention to sound advice based on experimental evidence. But whatever. I think there's enough been said by both sides now.
In mathematics at least I'd hope there's no room for disagreement. It's all a question of where the line is drawn. I draw it farther out, I think, than most.
In mathematics at least I'd hope there's no room for disagreement. It's all a question of where the line is drawn. I draw it farther out, I think, than most.
-- answer removed --
Right, for some people life is not the prize. It is their opinion that quality of life is such that in some circumstances their life becomes devalued to them. This is the case here. The young man is ill. He may die with or without the treatment. He has chosen not to have the treatment suggested because he does not wish to. That should be enough for anyone. It is not for you and a few others, and I will have to deal with that as there appears to be no way of dissuading you that someone's choice is such a chalice of value that it should never be undermined when it is solely about their own body.
I know some people who are so depressed every day that they would prefer to die. Why should it not be their right to do so when their every waking hour is a misery for example? I really cannot understand how an intelligent and caring human being can miss such a huge chunk of what the human condition actually is and why choice is the real prize not life necessarily.
I know some people who are so depressed every day that they would prefer to die. Why should it not be their right to do so when their every waking hour is a misery for example? I really cannot understand how an intelligent and caring human being can miss such a huge chunk of what the human condition actually is and why choice is the real prize not life necessarily.
but that is someone else's opinion, and if it just to happens to be against yours, why would that make them wrong, or you right, that is all this is about opinion. LG said what do you think of this case, that's it, you either agree or not. Nor is it going to change the case, if the boy doesn't want to have a transfusion then unless they are proposing strapping him to a trolley as been suggested, then not sure how they can proceed. I don't agree with his or his parents stance, but if that is his choice then they should leave him be.
the one thing i do know about people who say they want to die because they are so depressed is that very often it isn't what they want, but actual help, given by family, friends, and more importantly a good doctor who understands them, who can help and treat the person accordingly, i do know, been there and so have any number of friends. Most people who commit suicide do so on the spur of the moment, and there is no going back.. This young man is not in that category, he is refusing treatment over a belief, let him be if that is what he wants.
I think we've both got a bit silly sharingan.
Long story short, em -- but sometimes for me "it's just your opinion" is the last defence of someone who knows they are wrong but refuses to change their mind regardless. Arrogant of me to say so? Yes, definitely. But even so there are some things that you cannot, or should not, have an "opinion" about. The argument then is for me whether or not this is one of those cases.
Note that in the cases where "it's my opinion" is "fine" then choice does matter more than facts - perhaps because there are no facts. But I will always struggle to accept the idea that some people have that it's their right to be wrong.
Long story short, em -- but sometimes for me "it's just your opinion" is the last defence of someone who knows they are wrong but refuses to change their mind regardless. Arrogant of me to say so? Yes, definitely. But even so there are some things that you cannot, or should not, have an "opinion" about. The argument then is for me whether or not this is one of those cases.
Note that in the cases where "it's my opinion" is "fine" then choice does matter more than facts - perhaps because there are no facts. But I will always struggle to accept the idea that some people have that it's their right to be wrong.
em 10, the proposal is forcible sedation, if he does not comply, the young man will be restrained mechanically or more likely by many hospital staff and given a sedative injection. Likely the sedation will then be maintained for the duration of the transfusion. As I understand it more than one transfusion will be needed so the process will need to be repeated more than once. I am wondering whether the medical staff who have pursued this to court have ever been involved in the forcible administration of sedation, I have once as a student on placement at a mental health hospital. It isn't pleasant.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.