Khandro
mibn; //I do not seek belief nor ask to be believed.// I didn't say you did, I said you are trying to associate the act of lying to the beliefs of others, merely on the grounds that you do not share that belief. Even if a belief is not objectively true, believing it is doesn't constitute lying.
17:06 Thu 05th Sep 2013
Nor have I said that believing in the arbitrary constitutes lying, even if the assertion that one accepts as truth was in fact a deliberate lie. Repeating a lie does not necessarily make one a liar any more than believing a lie makes it true. To lie is to deliberately assert as fact that which one knows for a fact to be untrue.
The question is when, if ever, is lying justified and my previous post was an attempt to present such a circumstance, that being when a lie becomes necessary to defend oneself from the consequences of another's belief in the arbitrary, for example, when confronted with someone who believes in their 'god given' right or obligation to kill you.
I'm not sure there's much point really in trying to make the inherent incomprehensibility of religion comprehensible, but what the hey, for you this once, I gave it a shot. When one abandons objectivity and reason as their sole means of ascertaining and establishing the validity of their own beliefs for the sake of heaven knows what imagined benefit they hope to derive from it, it is they who have abdicated their right to demand from others the truth they have themselves abandoned.