Iron Chariots

[LazyGun]

Not a question, but a link to what appears at first glance to be a useful site for referencing common arguments raised when discussing atheism / theism.

http://wiki.ironchariots.org/index.php?title=Main_Page

[naomi24]

A good choice of title. I've asked many to explain that very odd verse. Interesting too that Ray Comfort & co get their very own link. I'll have a browse. Thanks LG.

[LazyGun]

nps Naomi. Only had the briefest glance to date, but it does appear to cover some of the more common areas of disagreement and debate pretty comprehensively.

[mibn2cweus]

< Likes ^

[naomi24]

LG, what does 'nps' mean?

[LazyGun]

nps = no problems :)

[naomi24]

Ah, thanks.

[jim360]

An interesting resource and one I might try to look at. I've already seen one or two new arguments that are improvements or additions to my own thoughts, especially on the "fine-tuning problem" that I really like their counter-argument to. My own counter runs something along the lines of an appeal to history, in that most or all problems in Science in the past have eventually disappeared as problems, or admitted plausible natural explanations, and it's not unreasonable to expect this trend to continue (I suppose, then, an inverted "god of gaps" argument -- that the gaps are closing, and this one is likely to be filled itself in due course). Theirs, that the argument from fine-tuning surely makes God himself bound by the same laws (otherwise he could have picked any value he wanted), is much more potent I think.

So thanks for the link.