Home & Garden0 min ago
Cartoons Cause Outrage- Again
128 Answers
A mini- storm has erupted, yet again, over a cartoon. This time it is an innocuous Jesus and Mo cartoon, worn on the T-shirts of 2 atheist studio guests debating religion on a BBC TV show. The BBC chose to censor the image of the T-shirts by pixillating them. Maajid Nawaz, also a guest on the show, an one-time islamic fundamentalist radical and now head of the Quilliam Foundation, was prompted to tweet that the image was innocuous and that God was greater than the outrage prompted by the image itself.
Cue hysterical muslim outrage, death threats - and a petition, organised by a muslim LibDem activist, to bar Nawaz from being the Lib-Dem PPC for Hampstead, which has, apparently, garnered 20,000 signatures, all presumably from outraged and offended UK muslims.
Then C4 get in the act, this time censoring the image of mohammed during their transmission.
Should we really be deferring to nonsensical religious sensibilities this way, by pro-actively censoring innocuous imagery that "might" cause offence to some?
http:// www.pat heos.co m/blogs /friend lyathei st/2014 /01/29/ in-the- u-k-cha nnel-4- news-pr ogram-c overs-u p-a-jes us-and- mo-draw ing-wit h-a-bla ck-blob -to-avo id-givi ng-offe nse/
For myself, I am irritated at the BBC and C4 for the self-censorship, and irritated at these activists lobbying against Nawaz.
Cue hysterical muslim outrage, death threats - and a petition, organised by a muslim LibDem activist, to bar Nawaz from being the Lib-Dem PPC for Hampstead, which has, apparently, garnered 20,000 signatures, all presumably from outraged and offended UK muslims.
Then C4 get in the act, this time censoring the image of mohammed during their transmission.
Should we really be deferring to nonsensical religious sensibilities this way, by pro-actively censoring innocuous imagery that "might" cause offence to some?
http://
For myself, I am irritated at the BBC and C4 for the self-censorship, and irritated at these activists lobbying against Nawaz.
Answers
Actually khandro, the real problem is that someone is making light of something that they take very seriously, and that makes them very angry. Couple that with a belief that a god wants you to act on his behalf to prevent/ punish the offender, and this is what you get. Religious people demanding that everyone respects the same things that they do. The fact that...
09:15 Thu 30th Jan 2014
Yes Naomi, the principle of 'If something offends, why not leave it alone?' seemed to get left by the wayside when it was me claiming to be offended by something khandro said.
Instead I got slapped down with a tetchy 'Who do think you are?' for my pains. In fact it's perfectly reasonable reponse, and one I deserved - which is of course the whole point.
Instead I got slapped down with a tetchy 'Who do think you are?' for my pains. In fact it's perfectly reasonable reponse, and one I deserved - which is of course the whole point.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.