Quizzes & Puzzles3 mins ago
Assessing Character
49 Answers
Is a penchant for religion an indication of a trustworthy character?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Mojo-Jo-Jo , //What makes you ask the question Naomi?//
Something Beso said here:
http:// www.the answerb ank.co. uk/Soci ety-and -Cultur e/Relig ion-and -Spirit uality/ Questio n132925 6-3.htm l
//However I have never found religion to be an indicator of a person's character.//
22:14 Wed 16th Apr 2014
It struck a chord because a highly respected Christian of my acquaintance, a veritable pillar of society, whose oft-repeated public expressions of her personal piety, humility, and self-depreciation know no bounds, is, in fact, probably the most craftily manipulative woman I’ve ever known. Mibs summed it up when he said, //Some it seems use religion as a means to cloak an even more sinister nature than those 'sins' they are all too eager to preach against, like a pack of back stabbing wolves in sheep's clothing ….//
Grasscarp, see Birdie’s response at 00:27 Thu 17th Apr 2014. I think it’s safe to say that priests, imams, etc, are generally considered to be trustworthy simply by virtue (not sure that’s the right word here!) of the position they hold.
Something Beso said here:
http://
//However I have never found religion to be an indicator of a person's character.//
22:14 Wed 16th Apr 2014
It struck a chord because a highly respected Christian of my acquaintance, a veritable pillar of society, whose oft-repeated public expressions of her personal piety, humility, and self-depreciation know no bounds, is, in fact, probably the most craftily manipulative woman I’ve ever known. Mibs summed it up when he said, //Some it seems use religion as a means to cloak an even more sinister nature than those 'sins' they are all too eager to preach against, like a pack of back stabbing wolves in sheep's clothing ….//
Grasscarp, see Birdie’s response at 00:27 Thu 17th Apr 2014. I think it’s safe to say that priests, imams, etc, are generally considered to be trustworthy simply by virtue (not sure that’s the right word here!) of the position they hold.
grasscarp
it came up in one of GoodLife's threads.
Ny - the lady who wears her religion on her lapel -we would call 'pi'.
NOT a good sign to good moral character altho by her nature she would strongly dispute that. memo: give wide berth at all times
I had to work with one [ probably for being a murderer in a past life ] and and the disconnect between what he said and what he did ....
I have been scarred ! scarred !
it came up in one of GoodLife's threads.
Ny - the lady who wears her religion on her lapel -we would call 'pi'.
NOT a good sign to good moral character altho by her nature she would strongly dispute that. memo: give wide berth at all times
I had to work with one [ probably for being a murderer in a past life ] and and the disconnect between what he said and what he did ....
I have been scarred ! scarred !
From personal experience, I have a handful of friends who are devout believers and attend church. They never broadcast it or discuss religion. Every one of them I would trust with my life.
I also know a few people who claim to be devout and broadcast it loud and often. Over time, every single one of them has been proved to be a hypocrite and I wouldn't trust them as far as I could spit.
I also know a few people who claim to be devout and broadcast it loud and often. Over time, every single one of them has been proved to be a hypocrite and I wouldn't trust them as far as I could spit.
It used to be that sexual behaviour was taken as an indication of character. However, the modern view seems to be that society has become mature enough to accept most variations of sexual behaviour without making any character assessment from them.
How long will it be until society is mature enough to accept most variations of religious belief or unbelief without making any character assessment from them?
How long will it be until society is mature enough to accept most variations of religious belief or unbelief without making any character assessment from them?
// What would religion or lack of have anything to do with trustworthiness? What prompts such an odd question? //
So your answer is 'no - the two things are unrelated' then. See, it's not that hard is it?
I agree with Grasscarp. I don't think they're related. IE, I don't think it's an indicator of trustworthiness or lack of it either.
So your answer is 'no - the two things are unrelated' then. See, it's not that hard is it?
I agree with Grasscarp. I don't think they're related. IE, I don't think it's an indicator of trustworthiness or lack of it either.
Judging by the reported behaviour of so many RC priests and that of some nuns and others who who supported them , the answer has got to be No!
I had a CofE vicar neighbour who at one time was responsible for the recruitment of new applicants to the priesthood. However he rejected so many as unsuitable ( over 50% ) that he was asked to explain why. He said because they were homosexual . The result was he was immediately sacked by his bishop. Or to use the bishop's words , " for health reasons he was reassigned to a less demanding role " . Something to do with allocating furniture in vicarages. I assume he was trustworthy enough to do that job.
I had a CofE vicar neighbour who at one time was responsible for the recruitment of new applicants to the priesthood. However he rejected so many as unsuitable ( over 50% ) that he was asked to explain why. He said because they were homosexual . The result was he was immediately sacked by his bishop. Or to use the bishop's words , " for health reasons he was reassigned to a less demanding role " . Something to do with allocating furniture in vicarages. I assume he was trustworthy enough to do that job.