Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Life After Death
58 Answers
I'm just reading 'Homo Deus' by Yuval Noah Harari (having read his earlier book, 'Sapiens'). In chapter 1 he states that nowhere in the Old Testament is there any reference to life after death; god simply set out the rules of obedience to, and worship of, himself, if the people wished to to avoid plagues, famines etc. It made me think that Jesus came up with a good idea in postulating a world where the masses (slaves for the most part) would be able to look forward to something better, even though their life experience (plagues, famines etc) told them that life was rubbish. The Jews were subjugated to the Romans and didn't have much in the way of prospects, and so a fair number of them were attracted to Jesus' new outlook, where all the pain and injustice of this world would be set right by God.
I realise that the Egyptians had an idea of an afterlife, although I suspect that it was reserved for the aristos.
What do OT fans think of this idea?
I realise that the Egyptians had an idea of an afterlife, although I suspect that it was reserved for the aristos.
What do OT fans think of this idea?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Atheist. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I’m quite sure, mainstream archeologists seem to be quite sure.
Ok none of us can prove it, but if you want to ignore the majority of religious history because there is no written documents from the time fair enough, but people back in Hunter gatherer days were religious. Ritualistic burial of bodies and grave goods is quite good evidence for that.
Ok none of us can prove it, but if you want to ignore the majority of religious history because there is no written documents from the time fair enough, but people back in Hunter gatherer days were religious. Ritualistic burial of bodies and grave goods is quite good evidence for that.
Steg, I don't want to ignore religious history, I find it fascinating.
As for grave and body decoration after death, we have no idea whether or not that had anything to do with what we would call religion. If my wife died in those days, I would not have chucked her in a ditch, I would have placed her reverently somewhere safe from predators, and given her a favourite dress or make-up. When someone died it would be natural to continue to respect the body and treat it accordingly. When a conqueror kills an enemy and mutilates and defiles the corpse, it's not done because of a belief in an afterlife.
As for grave and body decoration after death, we have no idea whether or not that had anything to do with what we would call religion. If my wife died in those days, I would not have chucked her in a ditch, I would have placed her reverently somewhere safe from predators, and given her a favourite dress or make-up. When someone died it would be natural to continue to respect the body and treat it accordingly. When a conqueror kills an enemy and mutilates and defiles the corpse, it's not done because of a belief in an afterlife.
Life after death can almost be taken as a given in the OT. At Jesus's time the Sadduccees were a Jewish group who appear not to have believed in the resurrection.
The disciples with Jesus at the Transfiguration had no problem thinking Moses and Elijah lived on.
Interestingly there is no mention of Hell as depicted in the NT in the OT although frequent references to the grave etc
The disciples with Jesus at the Transfiguration had no problem thinking Moses and Elijah lived on.
Interestingly there is no mention of Hell as depicted in the NT in the OT although frequent references to the grave etc
Fiveleaves, why can life after death be taken as a given in the OT, but hell cannot? I'm no bible expert, but I have the idea that the old god seemed to deal mainly with earthly punishments and rewards appropriate to the agrarian population who (in my view) wrote the OT - e.g. good/bad harvests, famines, plagues etc. He also seems to have had no sense of respect for animals; he put them under the rule of men to do what they wished with them, provided they didn't fornicate with them, and that they did save a share for god to receive as offerings.
//nowhere in the Old Testament is there any reference to life after death//
What about Ecc: 3 v 11 - He hath made everything beautiful in its time; also he hath set eternity in their heart.
Genesis 2 v 16 & 17 where God gives them every tree to eat from but then in v 17 he says: "but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil though shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die"
Would this not indicate that if they had not eaten from the forbidden tree they would have lived and not died?
Job 14 v 14 "If a man die, shall he live again, All the days of my warfare would I wait, till my release should come.,"
Job obviously believes he will live again stating he will wait for his release - release from death.
That's what I found.
What about Ecc: 3 v 11 - He hath made everything beautiful in its time; also he hath set eternity in their heart.
Genesis 2 v 16 & 17 where God gives them every tree to eat from but then in v 17 he says: "but of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil though shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die"
Would this not indicate that if they had not eaten from the forbidden tree they would have lived and not died?
Job 14 v 14 "If a man die, shall he live again, All the days of my warfare would I wait, till my release should come.,"
Job obviously believes he will live again stating he will wait for his release - release from death.
That's what I found.
Jesus was a Jew so it’s no surprise that he adhered to the concept of life after death. Much of the Old Testament is ambiguous but I think the following verse is pretty clear.
//And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, Some to everlasting life, Some to shame and everlasting contempt. // Daniel 12:2
Incidentally, I don’t think Jesus intended to introduce a new religion. Paul took it upon himself to do that - and with his own ideas. Jesus purpose, I believe, was something else entirely.
I’ve read Sapiens but have yet to read Homo Deus.
//And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, Some to everlasting life, Some to shame and everlasting contempt. // Daniel 12:2
Incidentally, I don’t think Jesus intended to introduce a new religion. Paul took it upon himself to do that - and with his own ideas. Jesus purpose, I believe, was something else entirely.
I’ve read Sapiens but have yet to read Homo Deus.
I think that if a belief gave the downtrodden hope, that was a side benefit. The main issue is whether one's sentience could be destroyed by bodily death, or whether it was separate and fundamental to driving the body whilst in that form. Many have experiences that suggest bodily death may not be the end of an individual's existence, so conjecture on a place one might find themselves after, is a legitimate subject for discussion and belief regardless what other benefits resulted in the here & now. (Including easier control of the masses.)
