Question Author
Theland, you say "Anything that pushes open the door a little to the occult is dangerous". By that reasoning, the bible should surely be included in this category? It's a book in which the Devil is a major player, unlike Harry Potter where the Devil is not on the cast list at all. Additionally the bible includes accounts of hundreds of supernatural events; of possession; of ghosts, and of what can only be described as magic tricks, but unlike Harry Potter, people like you believe the contents of bible to be indisputable fact, so by your yardstick that has to be far more dangerous.
As far as I know, one Christian, who has actually read Harry Potter, has contributed to this debate, and he seems to think there is no harm in it. Had he read it and come to the same conclusions as you and Mani, he would, of course, have had a valid argument.
To those who have read the books and know what they contain, the tolerance and 'anything goes' you mention isn't an issue, but your bigotry is. Had you taken the trouble to read Harry Potter, you may well have agreed with Luna's findings, because the books do not deal with the occult - the basic theme running throughout is one of love, and of the fight between good and evil. You and Mani may have seen adverts for Harry Potter, but I seriously doubt that this is why you have formed your opinions. To call for books first to be banned, and then to be given an 18 rating without having read them is illogical and unreasonable. Shall we go back to book burning? I wouldn't dream of commenting on the bible unless I had read it, and therefore I feel your argument is groundless - and completely irrational.