Quizzes & Puzzles5 mins ago
I`m ba ack
20 Answers
If you could come back as whoever you liked who would you choose?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by claymore. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.God. And then I would strike down upon thee with great vengeance and furious anger (etc etc) on those who ever doutbted I was real. Then I would put the world right, make everybody happy, accept blame for everything that has happened before, promise never to do it again and let everyone live long and prosper. Except Kerry Katona and Sharon Osbourne. I have some fork lightning I prepared earlier set by just for them. Then everyone can be marvelled at my great work and worship me for ever more.
naomi, I was about to warn you off your choice on the grounds that you might come back and discover that Mary of Magdala never existed and you'd find yourself in Fictionland.
Then I realised that it could be absolutely wonderful to find yourself in such a place for eternity. Gosh, you could...
...make love as often as you like to James Bond and Flashman and call on Superman to get you out of tight spots; help Sherlock with his reasoning; save Desdemona's life by telling Othello that Iago was lying; take the train to Market Blandings to spend a weekend with those wonderful Wodehouse characters; warn Romeo not to drink the poison because Juliet wasn't dead;
tell Winston Smith that 1984 won't really be like that.... the opportunities are endless.
Oh, and there's a 50/50 chance that you'd meet Jesus in Fictionland ... and certainly God!
Then I realised that it could be absolutely wonderful to find yourself in such a place for eternity. Gosh, you could...
...make love as often as you like to James Bond and Flashman and call on Superman to get you out of tight spots; help Sherlock with his reasoning; save Desdemona's life by telling Othello that Iago was lying; take the train to Market Blandings to spend a weekend with those wonderful Wodehouse characters; warn Romeo not to drink the poison because Juliet wasn't dead;
tell Winston Smith that 1984 won't really be like that.... the opportunities are endless.
Oh, and there's a 50/50 chance that you'd meet Jesus in Fictionland ... and certainly God!
Well being God an�all, I�d be omnipresent wouldn�t I, so I�d make sure I was at all the best parties wherever they were, even if that involved getting the odd round in, so drinks on me providing we start with the altar wine.
Obviously I�d have to stagger back to heaven once in a while with a couple of angels on each arm - you know to check my emails, balance the books on sins and confessions, check the world is at perace and send another sparkly bolt or two towards the Osbourne.
Obviously I�d have to stagger back to heaven once in a while with a couple of angels on each arm - you know to check my emails, balance the books on sins and confessions, check the world is at perace and send another sparkly bolt or two towards the Osbourne.
commonsense, I didn't actually say that Mary Magdalene (MM) didn't exist but that she might not have existed, and it would be very odd to come back as a phantom.
The problem is that MM occurs only in the gospels and we have no way of knowing how reliable they are. They were written years after the event, in the last third of the 1st century AD, by unknown people who weren't there and who had no previous material to work from; we can find no
accounts by any eye-witnesses nor anything written during Jesus' supposed times.
Because we don't know who the gospel writers were we have no idea whether they were truth-tellers or liars, historians or fantasists.
I personally wouldn't bet more than fourpence that the very minor character, MM, existed and am surprised that you can have spent 8 years studying her.
Have you found references to her by a recognised, named historian then?
(Sorry that this has suddenly got serious, folks, but 'commonsense' did ask!)
The problem is that MM occurs only in the gospels and we have no way of knowing how reliable they are. They were written years after the event, in the last third of the 1st century AD, by unknown people who weren't there and who had no previous material to work from; we can find no
accounts by any eye-witnesses nor anything written during Jesus' supposed times.
Because we don't know who the gospel writers were we have no idea whether they were truth-tellers or liars, historians or fantasists.
I personally wouldn't bet more than fourpence that the very minor character, MM, existed and am surprised that you can have spent 8 years studying her.
Have you found references to her by a recognised, named historian then?
(Sorry that this has suddenly got serious, folks, but 'commonsense' did ask!)