Quizzes & Puzzles17 mins ago
What is an agnostic?
36 Answers
The Greek I learned at school tells me that an agnostic is "one who doesn't know" (a = "without"; gnosos = "knowledge") but believing in God is not a question of knowing � that is impossible � but of deciding.
A believer, a theist, is one who has made the positive decision to believe in a supernatural being for whose existence there is no evidence. That is perfectly clear.
An atheist is one who has made no such decision and dismisses the whole idea out of hand. That is also clear.
So what is an agnostic? One who cannot decide? But decide what? Not whether God exists, that is unknowable. Cannot decide whether to make that theist decision?
I will now shut up for a while and invite enlightenment from agnostics who are kind enough to respond.
A believer, a theist, is one who has made the positive decision to believe in a supernatural being for whose existence there is no evidence. That is perfectly clear.
An atheist is one who has made no such decision and dismisses the whole idea out of hand. That is also clear.
So what is an agnostic? One who cannot decide? But decide what? Not whether God exists, that is unknowable. Cannot decide whether to make that theist decision?
I will now shut up for a while and invite enlightenment from agnostics who are kind enough to respond.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by chakka35. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Thomas Huxley invented the term
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Henry_Huxl ey_and_agnosticism
It's not that an agnostic doesn't know but rather considers the question of the existance of God to be unknowable.
It's fun to tease agnostics by asking them if they are agnostic about unicorns.
But less so if they are true agnostics.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Henry_Huxl ey_and_agnosticism
It's not that an agnostic doesn't know but rather considers the question of the existance of God to be unknowable.
It's fun to tease agnostics by asking them if they are agnostic about unicorns.
But less so if they are true agnostics.
Fair question chakka35 (what does the 35 stand for?)... Let me ask this: Can the existence of God (in this case, the God of the Bible) be proven or disproven? If, and I'm not trying to put words into your pixellated mouth, your answer is neither, then, on what basis do you choose to dismiss the whole idea out of hand?... Thanks!
�
Question: How is an agnostic different than an atheist?
Doubt versus certainty: An agnostic is either skeptical or believes that one cannot know whether there is a god or not. An atheist denies the existence of a god, or simply lacks belief.
Answer: There is not neccesarily a difference, agnosticism is the belief that the existence or non-existence of gods cannot be positively known either way, it is erroneously equated with being "undecided".
If you are undecided then you are an atheist or non-theist by default, because you don't believe in a god or gods. If you do believe in a god in general, but not a personal god, but do not claim to know this being exists, you are an agnostic deist. If you believe in a personal god or a god which has had contact with humans but do not claim positive knowledge, you are an agnostic theist. And if you believe gods don't exist but do not claim positive knowledge of this, you are an agnostic atheist.
(above is from Answers.Com)
�
�
From my chosen path i stray,
Yet my God ne'er turns away;
For i have learned -- and understand,
That where God is -- is where i am!
Question: How is an agnostic different than an atheist?
Doubt versus certainty: An agnostic is either skeptical or believes that one cannot know whether there is a god or not. An atheist denies the existence of a god, or simply lacks belief.
Answer: There is not neccesarily a difference, agnosticism is the belief that the existence or non-existence of gods cannot be positively known either way, it is erroneously equated with being "undecided".
If you are undecided then you are an atheist or non-theist by default, because you don't believe in a god or gods. If you do believe in a god in general, but not a personal god, but do not claim to know this being exists, you are an agnostic deist. If you believe in a personal god or a god which has had contact with humans but do not claim positive knowledge, you are an agnostic theist. And if you believe gods don't exist but do not claim positive knowledge of this, you are an agnostic atheist.
(above is from Answers.Com)
�
�
From my chosen path i stray,
Yet my God ne'er turns away;
For i have learned -- and understand,
That where God is -- is where i am!
I thought agnostic just meant 'unknowable'.
Hence it would seem quite clear that one who adopts the concept of agnosticism simply states that with our present knowledge, the existence of God cannot be proven or disproven and that neither theist or atheist has succeded in convincing them either way.
Of course you can also have
Agnostic theists - those who believe that a deity probably exists; and
Agnostic atheists - those who believe that it is very improbable that a deity exists.
I guess it comes down to individual beliefs. Incidentally, I thought an theist was one who had made a "decision" in that God cannot possibly exist, for which there is no evidence. Or are they just indecisive..?
Hence it would seem quite clear that one who adopts the concept of agnosticism simply states that with our present knowledge, the existence of God cannot be proven or disproven and that neither theist or atheist has succeded in convincing them either way.
Of course you can also have
Agnostic theists - those who believe that a deity probably exists; and
Agnostic atheists - those who believe that it is very improbable that a deity exists.
I guess it comes down to individual beliefs. Incidentally, I thought an theist was one who had made a "decision" in that God cannot possibly exist, for which there is no evidence. Or are they just indecisive..?
Thanks again, folks, for your response.
The reason for the preamble (postamble?) to my question is that I wanted to avoid a flood of replies that would, one way and another, merely tell me that an agnostic is someone who doesn�t know whether God exists. Since no-one on this planet can possibly have that knowledge, such a definition isn�t sufficient to distinguish an agnostic from the other 7000 million people on earth � despite jake-the-peg�s attempt to do so!
My ploy wasn�t particularly successful. That �don�t know� definition, in one form or another, is given with commendable briefness by naomi, Le Chat, bensmum, josie�s daughter, Jugglering and Postdog, and more long-windedly by Octavius and Esthmer (who also, puzzlingly, gives us a definition of �theist� that I think we all knew).
mib tells us that he is one of those who do know but, tantalisingly, doesn�t tell us what it is that he knows. brionon ignores the fact that we know what �agnostic� means in English. Clanad ignores the question and tries to restart that old chestnut about not being able to prove the nonexistence of God. Russell�s china teapot to you, Clanad. (And how can a mouth be pixillated, assuming that that�s the word you intended?)
I am now even more convinced that, in a world of universal non-knowledge on the subject, we define ourselves by our decisions. [AB never gives us the 2000 characters it promises, so I will pause here�
The reason for the preamble (postamble?) to my question is that I wanted to avoid a flood of replies that would, one way and another, merely tell me that an agnostic is someone who doesn�t know whether God exists. Since no-one on this planet can possibly have that knowledge, such a definition isn�t sufficient to distinguish an agnostic from the other 7000 million people on earth � despite jake-the-peg�s attempt to do so!
My ploy wasn�t particularly successful. That �don�t know� definition, in one form or another, is given with commendable briefness by naomi, Le Chat, bensmum, josie�s daughter, Jugglering and Postdog, and more long-windedly by Octavius and Esthmer (who also, puzzlingly, gives us a definition of �theist� that I think we all knew).
mib tells us that he is one of those who do know but, tantalisingly, doesn�t tell us what it is that he knows. brionon ignores the fact that we know what �agnostic� means in English. Clanad ignores the question and tries to restart that old chestnut about not being able to prove the nonexistence of God. Russell�s china teapot to you, Clanad. (And how can a mouth be pixillated, assuming that that�s the word you intended?)
I am now even more convinced that, in a world of universal non-knowledge on the subject, we define ourselves by our decisions. [AB never gives us the 2000 characters it promises, so I will pause here�
and resume here] An atheist makes the easiest decision. Since the existence of God has the same probability as that of Harry Potter and Cinderella�s Fairy Godmother, and is backed by zero evidence, he makes the rational, logical, commonsense decision that a belief in God is untenable, not to say absurd.
A theist is much braver: he scorns reason, lifts two fingers at logic, and laughs at the lack of evidence, saying that he is damn-well going to believe in God despite it all.
So what is an agnostic? Presumably one who cannot decide which decision to take � which is not the same as not knowing whether God exists.
A theist is much braver: he scorns reason, lifts two fingers at logic, and laughs at the lack of evidence, saying that he is damn-well going to believe in God despite it all.
So what is an agnostic? Presumably one who cannot decide which decision to take � which is not the same as not knowing whether God exists.
