Crosswords0 min ago
Turning your back on your faith
63 Answers
If turning your back on your faith would guarantee everlasting peace in this world, would you do it?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by naomi24. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Zabadak, No, I don't think it's a narrow definition. I think it's a factual definition. You say your faith has 'very little to do with the afterlife', but what does 'very little' mean? Both Christianity and Islam are founded on the promise of an afterlife so do you believe your soul will survive corporal death or not? Your answer doesn't make it clear.
While I still find it very difficult to understand how giving up any hope of an afterlife would in any way affect the peace of the world (or even a small bit of it), I am very much more interested in the kind of faith that is built on a present relationship, something that informs day to day living in the life that we know something about now. Tomorrow, and any tomorrows after that, can take care of themselves.
I think we might find some agreement in not being too thrilled with any religion that plays on fears of the fires of hell or promises of virgins in heaven (whatever good they may be!) to dragoon the faithless into the fold. I've never been too happy with that as a method.
Do I believe my soul will survive corporeal death? I think you'll find my lot believe in the resurrection of the body, but I'm not alone in thinking that it'll be interesting finding out what that really means when we get there. You can put an if in that sentence if you want!
PS I'n not dead yet - I don't want to go on the cart 8-)
I think we might find some agreement in not being too thrilled with any religion that plays on fears of the fires of hell or promises of virgins in heaven (whatever good they may be!) to dragoon the faithless into the fold. I've never been too happy with that as a method.
Do I believe my soul will survive corporeal death? I think you'll find my lot believe in the resurrection of the body, but I'm not alone in thinking that it'll be interesting finding out what that really means when we get there. You can put an if in that sentence if you want!
PS I'n not dead yet - I don't want to go on the cart 8-)
ummmm, oh my goodness! That's awful! I'm appalled to hear that from your son. Your mother's influence? Has to be doesn't it?
As for the afterlife, despite what anyone tells you, no one knows - they really don't. Not the priests, not the Imams, nor the atheists. No one. The real problem with religion for me arises from the psychopathic nature and the very limited capabilities of the bloke the Abrahamic religions tell me is the Almighty because he simply doesn't meet expectations. Now whether or not there is a genuine Almighty is another question, but if there is I very strongly suspect that it doesn't concern itself with us on a personal level as religion would have us suppose. I mean, honestly, can you believe that something that magnificent, that tremendous, that powerful, really cares about what we eat or what we wear? Although religion insists on telling us who live on this speck of dust that we're the bees knees as far as this vast universe goes, I have a sneaking suspicion we're not. All I can say is we need to think much bigger than religion because there is far more to nature than we can currently possibly imagine. Whilst there's every reason to reject the fear imposed by the men who continue to promote the lie of the cruel imposter that is Abraham's monster, my personal experiences leave me no alternative but to believe the soul survives corporal death, and therefore in my opinion there's no reason whatsoever to relinquish your belief in your dad's eternal love for you, or in your hopes for a happy reunion in the future. x
As for the afterlife, despite what anyone tells you, no one knows - they really don't. Not the priests, not the Imams, nor the atheists. No one. The real problem with religion for me arises from the psychopathic nature and the very limited capabilities of the bloke the Abrahamic religions tell me is the Almighty because he simply doesn't meet expectations. Now whether or not there is a genuine Almighty is another question, but if there is I very strongly suspect that it doesn't concern itself with us on a personal level as religion would have us suppose. I mean, honestly, can you believe that something that magnificent, that tremendous, that powerful, really cares about what we eat or what we wear? Although religion insists on telling us who live on this speck of dust that we're the bees knees as far as this vast universe goes, I have a sneaking suspicion we're not. All I can say is we need to think much bigger than religion because there is far more to nature than we can currently possibly imagine. Whilst there's every reason to reject the fear imposed by the men who continue to promote the lie of the cruel imposter that is Abraham's monster, my personal experiences leave me no alternative but to believe the soul survives corporal death, and therefore in my opinion there's no reason whatsoever to relinquish your belief in your dad's eternal love for you, or in your hopes for a happy reunion in the future. x
naomi
<<<they really don't. Not the priests, not the Imams, nor the atheists. No one. <<<
;-)...agreed.
However there is a phrase in Law that confronts the same problem as you have quoted above and that is "likelier than not" which solves many legal problems.
In my opinion,it is "likelier than not" that there is not an after life, but supporters of the "faith"would say the opposite.
I don´t think that one can go further than that.
You mention "love" that once again is difficult to define, so we are faced with two imponderables.
<<<they really don't. Not the priests, not the Imams, nor the atheists. No one. <<<
;-)...agreed.
However there is a phrase in Law that confronts the same problem as you have quoted above and that is "likelier than not" which solves many legal problems.
In my opinion,it is "likelier than not" that there is not an after life, but supporters of the "faith"would say the opposite.
I don´t think that one can go further than that.
You mention "love" that once again is difficult to define, so we are faced with two imponderables.
Naomi <Christadelphian?> I'm kinda flattered, but not sure they'd be. The "resurrection of the body" is in all the major versions of the Christian creed (as I'm sure you know). What that means is another discussion, probably with as many answers as there are people to discuss. I can cheerfully wait to find out the true answer.