ChatterBank1 min ago
Friedrich Nietzsche said
37 Answers
Is Man one of God’s blunders, or is God one of Man's?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by wildwood. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Given that he also said the following, I think I know which of those options Nietzsce favoured ;-)
"A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything"
and
"God is a thought who makes crooked all that is straight"
However I'm happy to go along with this:
"There cannot be a God because if there were one, I could not believe that I was not He" ;-)
Chris
"A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything"
and
"God is a thought who makes crooked all that is straight"
However I'm happy to go along with this:
"There cannot be a God because if there were one, I could not believe that I was not He" ;-)
Chris
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
The borderline between genius and madness is an indistinct line but I find that the vast majority of Nietzsche's writings not only make sense to me but they also provide me with a clarity of vision which I didn't have previously.
For example, one only has to look at the collective madness of anyone who believes in any form of god, to see the truth of this:
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule".
Chris
For example, one only has to look at the collective madness of anyone who believes in any form of god, to see the truth of this:
"Insanity in individuals is something rare - but in groups, parties, nations and epochs, it is the rule".
Chris
As a nihilist, SandyRoe, I have no belief whatsoever in any form of universal morality.
Moral codes are defined within individual societies and thus vary throughout eras and across geographical boundaries. (For example, sexual morality in ancient Rome was very different from that in modern western Europe which, in turn, is very different from that in many Islamic countries). To assume that the moral code of the society in which you live is necessarily the only valid code (or even the 'right' one) smacks of unquestioning arrogance.
Moral codes are defined within individual societies and thus vary throughout eras and across geographical boundaries. (For example, sexual morality in ancient Rome was very different from that in modern western Europe which, in turn, is very different from that in many Islamic countries). To assume that the moral code of the society in which you live is necessarily the only valid code (or even the 'right' one) smacks of unquestioning arrogance.