What Does It Mean When My Husbands...
Family & Relationships11 mins ago
Already we are seeing Ms Raynors planned changes to the definition of Islamaphobia which has the potential of stifling ay debate on this subject now we see MPs' wanting to make possessing photos of a Muslim woman without her hijab criminal offence.
In the light of a recent story where the old bill had to take a photo of a woman in a "pilar box" outfit it seems we are drifting into a third world nation many of these people came from.
I really worry for women and gays. How long before we have to leave this Isle?
No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.If a muslim women went somewhere without her cover-all then she must surely know others can see her, and her image will likely be captured. It can not possibly be considered "intimate" in any sane culture, and since the act was performed knowingly and willingly there can be no legitimate objection to the picture.
Some MPs seem to be in the wrong nation and would prefer a more backward place to live.
how would anyone know x woman was a muslim, it's not like they wear a sign on there heads, i dont think thye should get preferrential treatment because of there warped ideology, if anything the burka and all face coverings should be banned, could be bank robbers rapists murderers in disguise, they should be doing muslim women a favour and ban face coverings, o h but they won't go out erm i think they would out of necessity, and in the long run all of them would follow suit.