Quizzes & Puzzles1 min ago
Anelka's Quenelle
58 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/uk -258275 06
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/bu siness- 2581567 0
The FA charge him for making the gesture, and zoopla withdraw the club's sponsorship, allegedly for the same reason. some jewish commentators interviewed tonight felt it would be right to treat anti semitic behavior the same as racist gestures would be.
fair point? or mountain being made of molehill?
http://
The FA charge him for making the gesture, and zoopla withdraw the club's sponsorship, allegedly for the same reason. some jewish commentators interviewed tonight felt it would be right to treat anti semitic behavior the same as racist gestures would be.
fair point? or mountain being made of molehill?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by mushroom25. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Zoopla is co-owned by someone who is jewish. Not an excuse for making a daft decission, so maybe it is really the baggies poor form that made them withdraw.
Seeing as no one had seen or heard of the gesture outside France, And even there only the jewish lobby consider it offensive. The TV audience were oblivious, as was the crowd and the officials. No one was offended excepted people who wanted to be offended.
There is a racist element at work here. Anelka is muslim and black which is why a witch hunt has been initiated.
Seeing as no one had seen or heard of the gesture outside France, And even there only the jewish lobby consider it offensive. The TV audience were oblivious, as was the crowd and the officials. No one was offended excepted people who wanted to be offended.
There is a racist element at work here. Anelka is muslim and black which is why a witch hunt has been initiated.
.\\ Anelka is muslim and black which is why a witch hunt has been initiated.\\
He is no young inexperienced footballer, overpayed and prone to do stupid things.
He is experienced 34 years of age, been around the football scene and knew exactly what he was doing.
Are the authorities serious about racism in football?
If so he needs a significant suspension.
He is no young inexperienced footballer, overpayed and prone to do stupid things.
He is experienced 34 years of age, been around the football scene and knew exactly what he was doing.
Are the authorities serious about racism in football?
If so he needs a significant suspension.
Zebo
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ news/bl ogs-mag azine-m onitor- 2555058 1
Personally I think it is puerile and he should have known better.
http://
Personally I think it is puerile and he should have known better.
zebo, scroll down for the video on this link. It is but a short video and was the basis of what the BBC news showed yesterday.
http:// www.dai lymail. co.uk/s port/fo otball/ article -254314 4/Nicol as-Anel ka-char ged-new -racial -discri minatio n-rules -quenel le-gest ure.htm l
http://
// It is alleged that, in the 40th minute of the fixture, Anelka made a gesture which was abusive and/or indecent and/or insulting and/or improper, contrary to FA Rule E3[1].
It is further alleged that this is an aggravated breach, as defined in FA Rule E3[2], in that it included a reference to ethnic origin and/or race and/or religion or belief. //
Read more at http:// www.the fa.com/ news/go vernanc e/2014/ jan/nic olas-an elka-ch arged-2 10114#C PWgmMCP lEH6Apt L.99
The gesture was not insulting, improper or indecent. No one at the ground were insulted. The vast majority of the TV audience did not see a nazis salute they saw a goal celebration. It made no reference to jews.
I can't see that he broke either of the FA rules. It will be interesting to see how this pans out.
It is further alleged that this is an aggravated breach, as defined in FA Rule E3[2], in that it included a reference to ethnic origin and/or race and/or religion or belief. //
Read more at http://
The gesture was not insulting, improper or indecent. No one at the ground were insulted. The vast majority of the TV audience did not see a nazis salute they saw a goal celebration. It made no reference to jews.
I can't see that he broke either of the FA rules. It will be interesting to see how this pans out.
Just a thought.....people from England visiting Germany cheerfully made Nazi salutes as an alternative to shaking hands, before we became official enemies of Germany and Nazism. Had they known what their benign ignorance would result in, they surely wouldn't have made this gesture.
This quenelle doesn't have any impact here, but the man knew what effect it would have in France, and it did - tout suite in fact.
So now we know too how this is associated with a campaign of frightfulness from one group aimed at another group, so wouldn't it be better if we agreed it's not allowed?
This quenelle doesn't have any impact here, but the man knew what effect it would have in France, and it did - tout suite in fact.
So now we know too how this is associated with a campaign of frightfulness from one group aimed at another group, so wouldn't it be better if we agreed it's not allowed?
Mosaic.
There is nothing in the FAs rules banning it. But now we know what it is, it should be outlawed.
WBA have told Anelka not to make the gesture again, and he has obeyed that request. If he did it again, he could be disciplined by club. All clubs should instruct their players not to make the gesture.
But to charge the player with something hat isn't covered in the rules yet seems unjust.
There is nothing in the FAs rules banning it. But now we know what it is, it should be outlawed.
WBA have told Anelka not to make the gesture again, and he has obeyed that request. If he did it again, he could be disciplined by club. All clubs should instruct their players not to make the gesture.
But to charge the player with something hat isn't covered in the rules yet seems unjust.
So why did this French citizen choose this inoffensive, non-racist, non-religious, non anti-semitic gesture ? There are all manner of celebratory gestures he could make, so why choose one in sympathy with a comedian who has been banned in theatres all over France because of anti-semitism in his act ? (Under our law racism includes displays of religious hatred)
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.