Jobs & Education1 min ago
Cricket Qustion
Is it an elitist sport in this country? How many of the English cricket team went to a local comprehensive rather than a fee paying school?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by carolegif. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.five state schoolboys: Root, Bresnan, Tremlett, Anderson and (the now retired spinner) Swann
http:// www.huf fington post.co .uk/201 3/08/01 /ashes- 2013-cr icket-p layers- private ly-educ ated_n_ 3687757 .html
One reason I suspect is that cricket is no longer on terrestrial TV.
http://
One reason I suspect is that cricket is no longer on terrestrial TV.
When I was running the city teams in Sheffield (back in the late 1980s) hardly any players nominated by the local independent schools were ever good enough for the city (or county teams). Nearly all of the best players attended local comprehensive schools. They included our Under-15 captain, Michael Vaughan, who was a pupil at Silverdale (Comprehensive) School.
However it's fair to say that the best players usually came from families where there was considerable involvement with local club sides, who got youngsters involved with coaching, and playing competitively, from a very early age.
However it's fair to say that the best players usually came from families where there was considerable involvement with local club sides, who got youngsters involved with coaching, and playing competitively, from a very early age.
Cricket is not elitist but, alongside a general degradation in school sport, is not played as much at state schools as it used to be. Fee paying schools continue to play a lot of cricket, so it would make sense if they had a disproportionate representation in the national side.
However, many towns and villages have thriving leagues, e.g. I live in a town but my kids play for a local village side that has four adult teams and about nine junior teams.
However, many towns and villages have thriving leagues, e.g. I live in a town but my kids play for a local village side that has four adult teams and about nine junior teams.
I suppose the lack of competitive sport has made a difference. My grandchildren have to play for a 'team', and personal triumph is not encouraged.
My grandson who is 11 was actually reprimanded for being 'triumphalist' when he raised his arm in the air after winning a race he did not think he would win! Luckily the footsie team he pays for are quite happy for him to celebrate a little if he saves a goal or two!
My grandson who is 11 was actually reprimanded for being 'triumphalist' when he raised his arm in the air after winning a race he did not think he would win! Luckily the footsie team he pays for are quite happy for him to celebrate a little if he saves a goal or two!
Depends on local culture and amenities. Rugby players in Wales are state educated because rugby is part of life there. In England they are often the product of public schools, where everybody has to play the game, but few soccer players in England come from those. Sheffield and the rest of Yorkshire, has cricket as part of life and it follows that state educated boys are well represented..