ChatterBank0 min ago
Why Did They Pit Hamilton Under The Safety Car?
36 Answers
What a balls up! I cannot understand the thinking.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.//..we must have viewed via different cameras then!..//
Well you certainly must have - i saw no bratish behaviour from Hamilton .
Considering that he dominated the whole weekend in practice , qualifying and the race ; only to lose the race because of a balls up by the strategists ; i think he behaved very profesionally and maturely
What did you see that was bratish behaviour ? - I seriously would like to know .
Well you certainly must have - i saw no bratish behaviour from Hamilton .
Considering that he dominated the whole weekend in practice , qualifying and the race ; only to lose the race because of a balls up by the strategists ; i think he behaved very profesionally and maturely
What did you see that was bratish behaviour ? - I seriously would like to know .
Baz......my comment about Lewis is not a direct result of this years Monaco GP, its an opinion built up from years of viewing F1 both from the armchair and live.Talking to tech guys working at McLaren in Woking during the Lewis Jenson seasons compounds my opinion.Ron Dennis warned Lewis to curb his temper especially if cameras were around.He just managed to achieve this on Sunday.He then left the circuit in a rush........and took his ball with him.
His ex...Nicole kicked him out of bed because he would sulk for a month if he could'nt come first :-)
His ex...Nicole kicked him out of bed because he would sulk for a month if he could'nt come first :-)
I've been away for the weekend and recorded the race which I have just watched. Gutted is not enough.
Last year I had conspiracy theories at Mercedes in my mind. They've surfaced again. There was absolutely no reason in the world to pit Lewis. Pitting is a risk (the car can fall off the jack, a wheelnut can get stuck, etc. etc.). No need to pit unless necessary.
There was no need to pit Lewis:
- His tyres were newer certainly than Nico's and I think newer than Vettel's;
- There was no sign of them degrading;
- It was obvious that at most ten and probably a few as seven or eight racing laps remained;
- There was no need to "cover off" anything Ferrari might have done - if Vettel had pitted he would have emerged behind where he went in;
- Overtaking is practically impossible at Monaco and Lewis had the faster car anyway.
Nothing pointed to a pitstop. I have not listened to the post-race comments as I was disgusted with Mercedes' actions. I know that teams sometimes have to make quick decisions and they will sometimes get it wrong. But I cannot see any reason whatsoever to have pitted Lewis. It should not have been up for debate and at the moment, until I clam down, this stinks.
Last year I had conspiracy theories at Mercedes in my mind. They've surfaced again. There was absolutely no reason in the world to pit Lewis. Pitting is a risk (the car can fall off the jack, a wheelnut can get stuck, etc. etc.). No need to pit unless necessary.
There was no need to pit Lewis:
- His tyres were newer certainly than Nico's and I think newer than Vettel's;
- There was no sign of them degrading;
- It was obvious that at most ten and probably a few as seven or eight racing laps remained;
- There was no need to "cover off" anything Ferrari might have done - if Vettel had pitted he would have emerged behind where he went in;
- Overtaking is practically impossible at Monaco and Lewis had the faster car anyway.
Nothing pointed to a pitstop. I have not listened to the post-race comments as I was disgusted with Mercedes' actions. I know that teams sometimes have to make quick decisions and they will sometimes get it wrong. But I cannot see any reason whatsoever to have pitted Lewis. It should not have been up for debate and at the moment, until I clam down, this stinks.
No, not hindsight, BS, foresight.
You needed no "data" (which Mercedes seem to be relying on in their explanations) to see that Vettel was third, would have remained third (at best) if he had pitted and would have had just six or seven laps to overtake both Mercedes cars on a track where only one decent overtaking move was successful during the previous seventy laps. Mercedes did not make the wrong call - there was no call to make.
You needed no "data" (which Mercedes seem to be relying on in their explanations) to see that Vettel was third, would have remained third (at best) if he had pitted and would have had just six or seven laps to overtake both Mercedes cars on a track where only one decent overtaking move was successful during the previous seventy laps. Mercedes did not make the wrong call - there was no call to make.
No-one had mentioned it yet but did any of you notice the engine note of the safety car? For a street circuit, he was pretty much gunning it! It is only coincidence that it is also a Mercedes. No conspiracies there. No connection to the team.
I only raise it as it may be the team pitted Lewis on the basis of prior experience of the laptime of the safety car in previous years. This one just happened to be a second or two quicker, just enough for Vettel to shut the door when he saw Hamilton emerging. It is quite a long pit exit/blend zone.
To the best of my knowledge there are no stats on safety car laps for the commentators to quote.
I only raise it as it may be the team pitted Lewis on the basis of prior experience of the laptime of the safety car in previous years. This one just happened to be a second or two quicker, just enough for Vettel to shut the door when he saw Hamilton emerging. It is quite a long pit exit/blend zone.
To the best of my knowledge there are no stats on safety car laps for the commentators to quote.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.