Technology3 mins ago
Echoes Of Eubank Watson?
40 Answers
http:// www.bbc .co.uk/ sport/b oxing/3 5892327
Let's hope Nick pulls through.
Let's hope Nick pulls through.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.How much longer before this 'sport' where the intention is to inflict brain damage on your opponent is banned ? There are injuries in other sports as I well know ( I used to run a Hockey, Rugby and Cricket club with a horse racing stable as our next door neighbor)
But in all other sports injury is accidental, in boxing the main intent is to cause brain damage to ( knock out) your opponent! Professional boxing has no place in a civilized world !
But in all other sports injury is accidental, in boxing the main intent is to cause brain damage to ( knock out) your opponent! Professional boxing has no place in a civilized world !
I know what you say Lie In. Eubank snr was booed and warned by the ref when he was doing just that. All the boxers are very aware of the dangers and are told to protect themselves at all times by the ref. before any match. Many boxers still point out if an opponent is in trouble but can even have points deducted for such.
"Points deducted" - it's amazing to my mind that could occur for such a reason.
It would seem to me then that the corner men & ref didn't acquit themselves very well. Are they now reportable for the lapse in judgement that allowed this boxer to end up in hospital?
"Points deducted" should equate to "licence to officiate suspended".
As to Eubank Jr's quote from the link, he doesn't seem *too* despondent & I feel he could have been a tad more sympathetic -
"I have respect for anyone who steps in the ring. It's sad that he had to leave on a stretcher. All I wanted was his belt and I've done that. I've achieved my dream of becoming a British champion."
That's alright then.
It would seem to me then that the corner men & ref didn't acquit themselves very well. Are they now reportable for the lapse in judgement that allowed this boxer to end up in hospital?
"Points deducted" should equate to "licence to officiate suspended".
As to Eubank Jr's quote from the link, he doesn't seem *too* despondent & I feel he could have been a tad more sympathetic -
"I have respect for anyone who steps in the ring. It's sad that he had to leave on a stretcher. All I wanted was his belt and I've done that. I've achieved my dream of becoming a British champion."
That's alright then.
My point exactly - the corners & ref didn't act quickly enough IMO.
If I'd been in Eubank Jr's position I'd rather have lost by TKO knowing my opponent was still standing - surely they'd be able to set a rematch?
I suspect the large sums of money involved in the bout from the top to the bottom might have influenced the ref's handling of it, but as I've shown, I know nothing about the "noble art".
If I'd been in Eubank Jr's position I'd rather have lost by TKO knowing my opponent was still standing - surely they'd be able to set a rematch?
I suspect the large sums of money involved in the bout from the top to the bottom might have influenced the ref's handling of it, but as I've shown, I know nothing about the "noble art".
"If I'd been in Eubank Jr's position I'd rather have lost by TKO knowing my opponent was still standing - surely they'd be able to set a rematch? " - a creditable but naive attitude. No Boxer willingly allows a defeat on their record, reduces earnings immeasurably and would move him down the contender order, especially as he was the challenger in this case, could end a career very quickly. Really, boxers are not doctors they cannot stop fighting because they think the opponent is badly injured, that is the job of the officials. They occasionally get it wrong as they did last night. To anticipate your next point, yes, it is mainly about money.
No, I accept it's full-contact, tough & they know the risks.
Eubank Jr said "I hit him with some big shots, maybe the referee should have stopped the fight earlier."
So I'm asking *why* it's allowed to get to the point that a boxer's life is threatened? What's the point in allowing it to go that far when surely a win is a win? Does it become a *better* win somehow?
Sorry, but I'm struggling in my own corner of ignorance here.
Eubank Jr said "I hit him with some big shots, maybe the referee should have stopped the fight earlier."
So I'm asking *why* it's allowed to get to the point that a boxer's life is threatened? What's the point in allowing it to go that far when surely a win is a win? Does it become a *better* win somehow?
Sorry, but I'm struggling in my own corner of ignorance here.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.