thanks, dannyk. Someone suggested the golden goal business higher up and the reply was that players seldom scored one, they preferred to wait for penalties. Perhaps doing away with penalties would improve their response.
I referred to the cricket world cup before. That, in my view, should have been a tie (the match score was tied and the tie-breaker was tied). A score of 1-1 does invite extra time at least, but a score of 241-241 indicates to me that you simply can't separate the teams on the pitch.
That's what happens in the Olympics: if the 10,000 metres is a dead heat, they don't force the leaders to do a 100m sprint, and they don't count back to see who took more steps, they just award them both gold medals.
It could be done, in football and in rugby. Sometimes teams play at the highest level and simply come out equal. But everyone seems to insist sport must produce a "winner" even when it doesn't.